Immediate and late clinical outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis - A 5-year prospective analysis

Background-Carotid stenting is a less invasive percutaneous procedure than carotid endarterectomy for the treatment of carotid stenosis. Reports suggest that it can be performed with periprocedural complication rates similar to those of carotid endarterectomy. The purpose of this study was to determine short- and long-term outcomes in the largest prospective cohort of carotid stenting patients. Methods and Results-This study followed 528 consecutive patients (604 hemispheres/arteries) undergoing carotid stenting. There was a 0.65 (n = 3) fatal stroke rate and 1% (n = 5) nonstroke death rate at 30 days. The major stroke rate was 1% (n = 6), and the minor stroke rate was 4.8% (n = 29). The overall 30-day stroke and death rate was 7.4% (n = 43). Over the 5-year study period, the 30-day minor stroke rate improved from 7.1% (n = 7) for the first year to 3.1% (n = 5) for the fifth year (P<0.05 for trend). The best predictor of 30-day stroke and death was age <greater than or equal to>80 years. After the 30-day period, the incidence of fatal and nonfatal stroke was 3.2% (n = 31). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 3-year freedom from ipsilateral or fatal stroke was 92+/-1%. Conclusions-Experience from a single group of operators demonstrates that carotid stenting can be performed with an acceptable 30-day complication rate. Late follow-up also demonstrates a low rate of fatal and nonfatal stroke. These results suggest that carotid stenting may be comparable to carotid endarterectomy, and it underscores the clinical equipoise and premise for the National Institute of Health-supported. randomized Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stent Trial comparing carotid stenting with carotid endarterectomy.