Evolutionary medicine: A meaningful connection between omics, disease, and treatment

被引:16
作者
Abu-Asab, Mones [1 ]
Chaouchi, Mohamed [2 ]
Amri, Hakima [2 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Pathol Lab, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Dept Phys & Biophys, Washington, DC USA
关键词
biomarkers; cancer; early detection; evolution; omics; parsimony; phylogenetics;
D O I
10.1002/prca.200780047
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The evolutionary nature of diseases requires that their omics be analyzed by evolution-compatible analytical tools such as parsimony phylogenetics in order to reveal common mutations and pathways' modifications. Since the heterogeneity of the omics data renders some analytical tools such as phenetic clustering and Bayesian likelihood inefficient, a parsimony phylogenetic paradigm seems to connect between the omics and medicine. It offers a seamless, dynamic, predictive, and multidimensional analytical approach that reveals biological classes, and disease ontogenies; its analysis can be translated into practice for early detection, diagnosis, biomarker identification, prognosis, and assessment of treatment. Parsimony phylogenetics identifies classes of specimens, the clades, by their shared derived expressions, the synapomorphies, which are also the potential biomarkers for the classes that they delimit. Synapomorphies are determined through polarity assessment (ancestral vs. derived) of m/z or gene-expression values and parsimony analysis; this process also permits intra and interplatform comparability and produces higher concordance between platforms. Furthermore, major trends in the data are also interpreted from the graphical representation of the data as a tree diagram termed cladogram; it depicts directionality of change, identifies the transitional patterns from healthy to diseased, and can be developed into a predictive tool for early detection.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 134
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Phyloproteomics: What phylogenetic analysis reveals about serum proteomics [J].
Abu-Asab, Mones ;
Chaouchi, Mohamed ;
Amri, Hakima .
JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2006, 5 (09) :2236-2240
[2]  
Albert Victor A., 2005, P1
[3]   Microarray data analysis: from disarray to consolidation and consensus [J].
Allison, DB ;
Cui, XQ ;
Page, GP ;
Sabripour, M .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2006, 7 (01) :55-65
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Cladistics, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1096-0031.1989.TB00562.X
[5]  
Azzone GF, 1996, HIST PHIL LIFE SCI, V18, P83
[6]   Serum proteomics profiling - a young technology begins to mature [J].
Coombes, KR ;
Morris, JRS ;
Hu, JH ;
Edmonson, SR ;
Baggerly, KA .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2005, 23 (03) :291-292
[7]   Evolution in action [J].
Culotta, E ;
Pennisi, E .
SCIENCE, 2005, 310 (5756) :1878-1885
[8]  
Desper R, 2005, MATHEMATICS OF EVOLUTION AND PHYLOGENY, P1
[9]   Tumor classification using phylogenetic methods on expression data [J].
Desper, R ;
Khan, J ;
Schäffer, AA .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2004, 228 (04) :477-496
[10]   INFORMATION-CONTENT OF THE PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEM [J].
FARRIS, JS .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1979, 28 (04) :483-519