Improved language performance subsequent to low-frequency rTMS in patients with chronic non-fluent aphasia post-stroke

被引:117
作者
Barwood, C. H. S. [1 ]
Murdoch, B. E. [1 ]
Whelan, B. -M. [1 ]
Lloyd, D. [1 ,2 ]
Riek, S. [2 ]
Sullivan, J. D. O. [3 ]
Coulthard, A. [4 ]
Wong, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Ctr Neurogen Commun Disorders Res, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Human Movement Studies, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Dept Neurol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Dept Med Imaging, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
aphasia; language; stroke rehabilitation; transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS); TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VERBAL FLUENCY; FRONTAL-LOBE; RECOVERY; BRAIN; FMRI; TMS; ACTIVATION; PLASTICITY; CORTEX;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03284.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has emerged as a potential tool for neurorehabilitation and remediation of language in chronic non-fluent aphasia post-stroke. Inhibitory (1 Hz) rTMS has been applied to homologous language sites to facilitate behavioural language changes. Improvements in picture-naming performance and speech output over time have been reported. Methods: Low-frequency (1 Hz) rTMS was applied to six real stimulation and six sham placebo patients for 20 min per day, for 10 days, and behavioural language outcome measures were taken at baseline (pre-stimulation) and 2 months post-stimulation. Results: The findings demonstrate treatment-related changes observed in the stimulation group when compared to the placebo control group at 2 months post-stimulation on naming performance as well as other aspects of expressive language and auditory comprehension. Conclusions: These findings provide considerable evidence to support the theory of rTMS modulating mechanisms of transcallosal disinhibition in the aphasic brain and highlight the potential clinical applications for language rehabilitation post-stroke.
引用
收藏
页码:935 / 943
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Amunts K, 1999, J COMP NEUROL, V412, P319, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990920)412:2<319::AID-CNE10>3.0.CO
  • [2] 2-7
  • [3] Analysis of neural mechanisms underlying verbal fluency in cytoarchitectonically defined stereotaxic space - The roles of Brodmann areas 44 and 45
    Amunts, K
    Weiss, PH
    Mohlberg, H
    Pieperhoff, P
    Eickhoff, S
    Gurd, JM
    Marshall, JC
    Shah, NJ
    Fink, GR
    Zilles, K
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2004, 22 (01) : 42 - 56
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2001, ASSESSMENT APHASIA R
  • [5] Recovery from nonfluent aphasia after melodic intonation therapy: A PET study
    Belin, P
    VanEeckhout, P
    Zilbovicius, M
    Remy, P
    Francois, C
    Guillaume, S
    Chain, F
    Rancurel, G
    Samson, Y
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1996, 47 (06) : 1504 - 1511
  • [6] Broca Paul, 1861, Bulletin et Memoires de La Societe Anatomique de Paris, V6, P330, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195177640.003.0018
  • [7] The role of the left frontal lobe in action naming - rTMS evidence
    Cappa, SF
    Sandrini, M
    Rossini, PM
    Sosta, K
    Miniussi, C
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2002, 59 (05) : 720 - 723
  • [8] Neural correlates of naming actions and of naming spatial relations
    Damasio, H
    Grabowski, TJ
    Tranel, D
    Ponto, LLB
    Hichwa, RD
    Damasio, AR
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 13 (06) : 1053 - 1064
  • [9] Semantic processing in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: A combined functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation study
    Devlin, JT
    Matthews, PM
    Rushworth, MFS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 15 (01) : 71 - 84
  • [10] Stimulating conversation: Enhancement of elicited propositional speech in a patient with chronic non-fluent aphasia following transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Hamilton, Roy H.
    Sanders, Linda
    Benson, Jennifer
    Faseyitan, Olufunsho
    Norise, Catherine
    Naeser, Margaret
    Martin, Paula
    Coslett, H. Branch
    [J]. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2010, 113 (01) : 45 - 50