Ovarian activity in women taking an oral contraceptive containing 20 μg ethinyl estradiol and 150 μg desogestrel:: Effects of low estrogen doses during the hormone-free interval

被引:59
作者
Killick, SR
Fitzgerald, C
Davis, A
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Princess Royal Hosp, Kingston Upon Hull HU8 9HE, Yorks, England
[2] Stepping Hill Hosp, Stockport, England
[3] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
Mircette (TM); desogestrel; folliculogenesis; ovarian suppression; oral contraception;
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70292-3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: We assessed the effect of low ethinyl estradiol doses given during the nominally hormone-free interval of the Mircetter(TM) (brand of desogestrel/ethinyl estradiol and ethinyl estradiol) contraceptive regimen on ovarian activity. STUDY DESIGN: In a randomized, double-blind study, healthy women received 150 mu g desogestrel and 20 mu g ethinyl estradiol for 21 days followed by either placebo for 7 days (Mircette(TM)/placebo; N = 24) or placebo for 2 days and 10 mu g ethinyl estradiol for 5 days (Mircette(TM)/ethinyl estradiol; N = 23). RESULTS: During cycles 2 and 3, the Mircette(TM)/placebo group had a higher incidence of persistent ovarian follicles (eight subjects versus three subjects) and on average a greater maximum follicle diameter than the Mircette(TM)/ethinyl estradiol group. One Mircette(TM)/placebo subject probably ovulated in cycle 2, and another had a luteinized unruptured follicle; no such activity was seen in the in the Mircette(TM)/ethinyl estradiol group. The study medication was well tolerated, and there were no apparent between-group differences in vaginal bleeding patterns. CONCLUSION: The Mircette(TM) regimen, which includes low ethinyl estradiol doses during the hormone-free interval, more effectively suppresses ovarian follicular activity with a low monthly estrogen dose.
引用
收藏
页码:S18 / S24
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Akin M, 1998, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V179, pS2
[2]   Ovarian activity during regular oral contraceptive use [J].
Crosignani, PG ;
Testa, G ;
Vegetti, W ;
Parazzini, F .
CONTRACEPTION, 1996, 54 (05) :271-273
[3]   EFFECTS OF A LOW-ESTROGEN ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVE ON URINARY-EXCRETION OF LUTEINIZING-HORMONE AND OVARIAN STEROIDS [J].
ELSTEIN, M ;
BRISTON, PG ;
JENKINS, M ;
KIRK, D ;
MILLER, H .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1974, 1 (5896) :11-13
[4]   Manipulation of human ovarian function: Physiological concepts and clinical consequences [J].
Fauser, BCJM ;
VanHeusden, AM .
ENDOCRINE REVIEWS, 1997, 18 (01) :71-106
[5]   A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF 2 MONOPHASIC LOW-DOSE ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVES ON THE INHIBITION OF OVULATION [J].
FITZGERALD, C ;
FEICHTINGER, W ;
SPONA, J ;
ELSTEIN, M ;
LUDICKE, F ;
MULLER, U ;
WILLIAMS, C .
ADVANCES IN CONTRACEPTION, 1994, 10 (01) :5-18
[6]   NEW PROGESTOGENS IN ORAL CONTRACEPTION [J].
FOTHERBY, K ;
CALDWELL, ADS .
CONTRACEPTION, 1994, 49 (01) :1-32
[7]  
Fotherby K., 1994, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Abingdon), V14, P327, DOI 10.3109/01443619409027605
[8]  
HEDON B, 1992, INT J FERTIL S3, V27, P162
[9]  
KILLICK SR, 1989, FERTIL STERIL, V52, P580
[10]  
LACHNITFIXSON U, 1982, UPDATE TRIPHASIC ORA, P37