Escitalopram in the treatment of social anxiety disorder: Analysis of efficacy for different clinical subgroups and symptom dimensions

被引:30
作者
Stein, DJ [1 ]
Kasper, S
Andersen, EW
Nil, R
Lader, M
机构
[1] Univ Stellenbosch, MRC Unit Anxiety Disorders, Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Univ Vienna, Dept Gen Psychiat, Vienna, Austria
[4] Lundbeck AS, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Lundbeck Switzerland Ltd, Glattbrugg, Switzerland
[6] Univ London, Inst Psychiat, London, England
关键词
escitalopram; social anxiety disorder; factor analysis; Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale; symptom dimension; Sheehan Disability Scale;
D O I
10.1002/da.20043
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Escitalopram has demonstrated efficacy for the acute treatment of social anxiety disorder (SAD) in two placebo-controlled trials and for long-term treatment in a relapse-prevention study. Social anxiety disorder is a heterogeneous disorder. This study questions whether this new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor is effective across different subgroups of patients. Data from two randomised, placebo-controlled, 12-week escitalopram SAD trials were pooled. General linear models were used to determine the efficacy of escitalopram in different patient subgroups. Furthermore, a factor analysis of the primary efficacy scale, the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS), was undertaken, and a determination made of whether treatment effects were similar for the different symptom dimensions. Escitalopram was effective in both younger and older patients, in male and female patients, and in patients with more and less severe social anxiety symptoms. The LSAS factor analysis showed six factors, which were differentially associated with different areas of disability. Escitalopram was significantly superior to placebo for all six symptom dimensions. The treatment effects of escitalopram were independent of gender, symptom severity and chronicity, and comorbid depressive symptoms. A six-factor model of social anxiety symptoms is supported by the distinctive association between these symptom dimensions and different areas of disability, but did not predict differential response to escitalopram. Depression and Anxiety 20:175-181, 2004. (C) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 181
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1987, MODERN PROBLEMS PHAR
[2]  
Ballenger JC, 1998, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V59, P54
[3]   The evidence-based pharmacological treatment of social anxiety disorder [J].
Blanco, C ;
Raza, MS ;
Schneier, FR ;
Liebowitz, MR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 6 (04) :427-442
[4]   Psychometric properties of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) - New self-rating scale [J].
Connor, KM ;
Davidson, JRT ;
Churchill, LE ;
Sherwood, A ;
Foa, E ;
Weisler, RH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 176 :379-386
[5]   The Brief Social Phobia Scale: A psychometric evaluation [J].
Davidson, JRT ;
Miner, CM ;
DeVeaughGeiss, J ;
Tupler, LA ;
Colket, JT ;
Potts, NLS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1997, 27 (01) :161-166
[6]   PATTERNS OF ANXIETY - AN ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL ANXIETIES [J].
DIXON, JJ ;
DEMONCHAUX, C ;
SANDLER, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1957, 30 (02) :107-112
[7]   An empirical approach to subtype identification in individuals with social phobia [J].
Eng, W ;
Heimberg, RG ;
Coles, ME ;
Schneier, FR ;
Liebowitz, MR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2000, 30 (06) :1345-1357
[8]   THE ISSUE OF SUBTYPES IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF SOCIAL PHOBIA [J].
HEIMBERG, RG ;
HOLT, CS ;
SCHNEIER, FR ;
SPITZER, RL ;
LIEBOWITZ, MR .
JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 1993, 7 (03) :249-269
[9]  
KASPER S, 2004, IN PRESS BR J PSYCH
[10]   Social phobia subtypes in the national comorbidity survey [J].
Kessler, RC ;
Stein, MB ;
Berglund, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 155 (05) :613-619