Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast, cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women - The Women's Health Initiative Randomized trial

被引:1380
作者
Chlebowski, RT
Hendrix, SL
Langer, RD
Stefanick, ML
Gass, M
Lane, D
Rodabough, RJ
Gilligan, MA
Cyr, MG
Thomson, CA
Khandekar, J
Petrovitch, H
McTiernan, A
机构
[1] Harbor UCLA Res & Educ Inst, Torrance, CA 90502 USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Med, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[5] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[6] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Prevent Med, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[7] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[8] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Med, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[9] Brown Med Sch, Dept Med, Providence, RI USA
[10] Univ Arizona, Tucson, AZ USA
[11] Evanston NW Healthcare, Dept Med, Evanston, IL USA
[12] Univ Hawaii, John A Burns Sch Med, Dept Geriatr & Med, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2003年 / 289卷 / 24期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.289.24.3243
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context The Women's Health Initiative trial of combined estrogen plus progestin was stopped early when overall health risks, including invasive breast cancer, exceeded benefits. Outstanding issues not previously addressed include characteristics of breast cancers observed among women using hormones and whether diagnosis may be influenced by hormone effects on mammography. Objective To determine the relationship among estrogen plus progestin use, breast cancer characteristics, and mammography recommendations. Design, Setting, and Participants Following a comprehensive breast cancer risk assessment, 16608 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years with an intact uterus were randomly assigned to receive combined conjugated equine estrogens (0.625 mg/d) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (2.5 mg/d) or placebo from 1993 to 1998 at 40 clinical centers. Screening mammography and clinical breast examinations were performed at baseline and yearly thereafter. Main Outcome Measures Breast cancer number and characteristics, and frequency of abnormal mammograms by estrogen plus progestin exposure. Results In intent-to-treat analyses, estrogen plus progestin increased total (245 vs 185 cases; hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; weighted P<001) and invasive (199 vs 150 cases; HR, 1.24; weighted P=.003) breast cancers compared with placebo. The invasive breast cancers diagnosed in the estrogen plus progestin group were similar in histology and grade but were larger (mean [SD], 1.7 cm [1.11 vs 1.5 cm [0.9], respectively; P=.04) and were at more advanced stage (regional/metastatic 25.4% vs 16.0%, respectively; P=.04) compared with those diagnosed in the placebo group. After 1 year, the percentage of women with abnormal mammograms was substantially greater in the estrogen plus progestin group (716 [9.4%] of 7656) compared with placebo group (398 [5.4%] of 7310; P<001), a pattern which continued for the study duration. Conclusions Relatively short-term combined estrogen plus progestin use increases incident breast cancers, which are diagnosed at a more advanced stage compared with placebo use, and also substantially increases the percentage of women with abnormal mammograms. These results suggest estrogen plus progestin may stimulate breast cancer growth and hinder breast cancer diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:3243 / 3253
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 2002, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V76, P333
[2]  
Anderson G, 1998, CONTROL CLIN TRIALS, V19, P61
[3]   Hormone replacement therapy and the sensitivity and specificity of breast cancer screening: a review [J].
Banks, E .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2001, 8 (01) :29-35
[4]   Increased patient concern after false-positive mammograms - Clinician documentation and subsequent ambulatory visits [J].
Barton, MB ;
Moore, S ;
Polk, S ;
Shtatland, E ;
Elmore, JG ;
Fletcher, SW .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 16 (03) :150-156
[5]   Evidence from randomised trials on the long-term effects of hormone replacement therapy [J].
Beral, V ;
Banks, E ;
Reeves, G .
LANCET, 2002, 360 (9337) :942-944
[6]  
Beral V, 1997, LANCET, V350, P1047, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08233-0
[7]   Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy for primary prevention of chronic conditions: Recommendations and rationale [J].
Berg, AO ;
Allan, JD ;
Frame, P ;
Homer, CJ ;
Johnson, MS ;
Klein, JD ;
Lieu, TA ;
Orleans, CT ;
Peipert, JF ;
Pender, NJ ;
Siu, AL ;
Teutsch, SM ;
Woolf, SH .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 137 (10) :834-839
[8]  
Carney PA, 2003, ANN INTERN MED, V138, P168, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008
[9]   Hormone replacement therapy in relation to breast cancer [J].
Chen, CL ;
Weiss, NS ;
Newcomb, P ;
Barlow, WN ;
White, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (06) :734-741
[10]   American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment of pharmacologic interventions for breast cancer risk reduction including tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibition [J].
Chlebowski, RT ;
Col, N ;
Winer, EP ;
Collyar, DE ;
Cummings, SR ;
Vogel, VG ;
Burstein, HJ ;
Eisen, A ;
Lipkus, I ;
Pfister, DG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (15) :3328-3343