The importance of conducting and reporting pilot studies: the example of the Scottish Births Survey

被引:145
作者
van Teijlingen, ER [1 ]
Rennie, AM
Hundley, V
Graham, W
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Sch Med, Dugald Baird Ctr Res Womens Hlth, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
[3] Aberdeen Matern Hosp, Dugald Baird Ctr Res Womens Hlth, Aberdeen, Scotland
[4] Univ Aberdeen, Foresterhill Hlth Ctr, Ctr Adv Studies Nursing, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
关键词
pilot studies; methodology; midwifery research; satisfaction studies; UK Data Protection Act (1998); maternity care;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01757.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background. In many research papers, pilot studies are only reported as a means of justifying the methods. This justification might refer to the overall research design, or simply to the validity and reliability of the research tools. It is unusual for reports of pilot studies to include practical problems faced by the researcher(s). Pilot studies are relevant to best practice in research, but their potential for other researchers appears to be ignored. Objective. The primary aim of this study was to identify the most appropriate method for conducting a national survey of maternity care. Methods. Pilot studies were conducted in five hospitals to establish the best of four possible methods of approaching women, distributing questionnaires and encouraging the return of these questionnaires. Variations in the pilot studies included (a) whether or not the questionnaires were anonymous, (b) the staff involved in distributing the questionnaires and ici whether questionnaires were distributed via central or local processes. For this purpose, five maternity hospitals of different sizes in Scotland were included. Results. Problems in contacting women as a result of changes in the Data Protection Act (1998) required us to rely heavily on service providers. However, this resulted ill a number of difficulties. These included poor distribution rates in areas where distribution relied upon service providers, unauthorized changes to the study protocol and limited or inaccurate information regarding the numbers of questionnaires distributed. Conclusions. The pilot raised a number of fundamental issues related to the process of conducting a large-scale survey, including the method of distributing the questionnaire, gaining access to patients, and reliance on 'gatekeepers'. This paper highlights the lessons learned as well as the balancing act of using research methods in the most optimal way under the combined pressure of time, ethical considerations and the influences of stakeholders. Reporting the kinds of practical issues that occur during pilot studies might help others avoid similar pitfalls anti mistakes.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 295
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
*AUD COMM, 1996, MAT CAR SURV
[2]  
Baird C, 2000, Orthop Nurs, V19, P42
[3]  
BAKER R, 1990, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V40, P487
[4]   Non-response in survey research: a methodological discussion and development of an explanatory model [J].
Barriball, KL ;
While, AE .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1999, 30 (03) :677-686
[5]  
Beurskens A J, 1998, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V142, P2142
[6]  
Bourne I., 2000, BJHC&IM-British Journal of Healthcare Computing & Information Management, V17, P27
[7]  
BOWLING A, 1997, RES METHODS HLTH INV, P232
[8]  
BURNS N, 1999, UNDERSTANDING NURSIN, P40
[9]   Design, objectives, and lessons from a pilot 25 year follow up re-survey of survivors in the Whitehall study of London Civil Servants [J].
Clarke, R ;
Breeze, E ;
Sherliker, P ;
Shipley, M ;
Youngman, L ;
Fletcher, A ;
Fuhrer, R ;
Leon, D ;
Parish, S ;
Collins, R ;
Marmot, M .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1998, 52 (06) :364-369
[10]  
COURTS N, 1997, TAR HEEL NURSE, V59, P22