The effects of broadband noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds |ba| and |da|

被引:113
作者
Whiting, KA
Martin, BA
Stapells, DR
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Sch Audiol & Speech Sci, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
[2] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Auditory Evoked Potential Res Lab, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[3] Fordham Univ, Doctoral Program Dev Psychol, Bronx, NY 10458 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00003446-199806000-00005
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective: To systematically investigate in normal-hearing listeners the effects of decreased audibility produced by broadband noise masking on the cortical event-related potentials (ERPs) N1, N2, and P3 to the speech sounds /ba/ and /da/. Design: Ten normal-hearing adult listeners actively (button-press response) discriminated the speech sounds /ba/ and /da/ presented in quiet (no masking) or with broadband masking noise (BBN), using an ERP oddball paradigm. The BBN was presented at 50, 60, and 70 dB SPL when speech sounds were presented at 65 dB ppe SPL and at 60, 70 and, 80 dB SPL when speech sounds were presented at 80 dB ppe SPL. Results: On average, the 50, 60, 70, and 80 dB SPL BBN maskers produced behavioral threshold elevations of 18, 25, 35, and 48 dB (average for 250 to 4000 Hz), respectively. The BBN maskers produced significant decreases (relative to quiet condition) in ERP amplitudes and behavioral discriminability. These decreases did not occur, however, until the noise masker intensity (in dB SPL) was equal to or greater than the speech stimulus intensity (in dB ppe SPL), that is, until speech to noise ratios (SNRs) were less than or equal to 0 dB. N1 remained present even after N2, P3, and behavioral discriminability were absent. In contrast to amplitudes, ERP and behavioral latencies showed significant decreases at higher (better) SNRs. Significant latency increases occurred when the noise maskers were within 10 to 20 dB of the stimuli (i.e., SNR less than or equal to 20 dB). The effects of masking were greater for responses to /da/ compared with /ba/. Latency increases occurred with less masking for N1 than for P3 or behavioral reaction time, with N2 falling in between. Conclusions: These results indicate that decreased audibility as a result of masking affects the various ERP peaks in a differential manner and that latencies are more sensitive indicators of these masking effects than are amplitudes.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 231
页数:14
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   EVENT-RELATED BRAIN POTENTIAL OF HUMAN NEWBORNS TO PITCH CHANGE OF AN ACOUSTIC STIMULUS [J].
ALHO, K ;
SAINIO, K ;
SAJANIEMI, N ;
REINIKAINEN, K ;
NAATANEN, R .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 77 (02) :151-155
[2]  
*AM NAT STAND I, 1989, S361989
[3]   DIAGNOSIS OF DEAFNESS IN INFANTS WITH USE OF COMPUTER-AVERAGED ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC RESPONSES TO SOUND [J].
BARNET, AB ;
LODGE, A .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1966, 69 (5P1) :753-+
[4]   CONSONANT CONFUSIONS IN PATIENTS WITH SENSORINEURAL HEARING-LOSS [J].
BILGER, RC ;
WANG, MD .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1976, 19 (04) :718-748
[5]   AUDITORY-PERCEPTION OF SPEECH CONTRASTS BY SUBJECTS WITH SENSORINEURAL HEARING-LOSS [J].
BOOTHROYD, A .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1984, 27 (01) :134-144
[6]  
Boothroyd A., 1993, Acoustical factors affecting hearing aid performance, V2, P277
[7]  
Boothroyd A, 1978, AUDITORY MANAGEMENT, P117
[8]   THE EFFECT OF BROAD-BAND NOISE ON THE HUMAN BRAIN-STEM AUDITORY EVOKED-RESPONSE .1. RATE AND INTENSITY EFFECTS [J].
BURKARD, R ;
HECOX, K .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1983, 74 (04) :1204-1213
[9]  
CHEOURLUHTANEN M, 1995, HEARING RES, V82, P53, DOI 10.1016/0378-5955(94)00164-L
[10]   A PROCEDURE FOR QUANTIFYING THE EFFECTS OF NOISE ON SPEECH RECOGNITION [J].
DIRKS, DD ;
MORGAN, DE ;
DUBNO, JR .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1982, 47 (02) :114-123