Local community reaction to the 'no-take' policy on fishing in the Tsitsikamma National Park, South Africa

被引:44
作者
Faasen, Helena
Watts, Scotney
机构
[1] Univ Stellenbosch, Fac Agrisci, Conservat Ecol & Entomol Dept, ZA-7602 Matieland, South Africa
[2] Univ Stellenbosch, Conservat Ecol Dept, ZA-7600 Stellenbosch, South Africa
关键词
age; education; ethnicity; gender; illegal fishing; residence status; wealth;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.06.026
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Fishing in the Tsitsikamma National Park has officially been halted since 2001. However, the desire to fish in the Marine Protected Area remains high among the local communities in Tsitsikamma. This has led to illegal fishing practices in the park. Consequently, the reaction of the local communities was measured using semi-structured questionnaires, informal interactions, personal observations, and through a key informant workshop that was organized in the Tsitsikamma National Park. It was found that responses from local communities to fishing within the park were defined by their residence status, ethnicity, gender, income, and educational level. There is a general understanding by local communities that the purpose of the Tsitsikamma National Park is to conserve nature within its boundaries. However, there is a mismatch in the understanding of the term 'conservation' between the local communities and conservation officials of the South African National Parks (SANParks). Local communities consider conservation to include sustainable utilization while conservation officials from the practice pursue absolute protection of the marine fisheries resources. The majority of local communities in Tsitsikamma resent this SANParks 'no-take' policy on fishing. They would like access to the fisheries resources in the Tsitsikamma National Park for both subsistence and recreational purposes. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 46
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Wildlife Conservation through People-Centred Approaches to Natural Resource Management Programmes and the Control of Wildlife Exploitation [J].
Algotsson, Emma .
LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 11 (01) :79-93
[2]   Community attitudes toward three protected areas in Upper Myanmar (Burma) [J].
Allendorf, Teri ;
Swe, Khaing Khaing ;
Oo, Thida ;
Htut, Ye ;
Aung, Myint ;
Aung, Myint ;
Allendorf, Keera ;
Hayek, Lee-Ann ;
Leimgrubek, Peter ;
Wemmer, Chris .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2006, 33 (04) :344-352
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, AFRICAN WILDLIFE LIV
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Environmental Education Research, DOI DOI 10.1080/13504620120081269
[5]   Do developmental initiatives influence local attitudes toward conservation? A case study from the Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, India [J].
Arjunan, M ;
Holmes, C ;
Puyravaud, JP ;
Davidar, P .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2006, 79 (02) :188-197
[6]   Impacts of community-based conservation on local communities in the annapurna conservation area, nepal [J].
Bajracharya, Siddhartha B. ;
Furley, Peter A. ;
Newton, Adrian C. .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2006, 15 (08) :2765-2786
[7]  
BESTER E, 2005, COMMUNICATION
[8]   Beyond the square wheel: Toward a more comprehensive understanding of biodiversity conservation as social and political process [J].
Brechin, SR ;
Wilshusen, PR ;
Fortwangler, CL ;
West, PC .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2002, 15 (01) :41-64
[9]   Translating data into meaning: Education in conservation biology [J].
Brewer, Carol .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2006, 20 (03) :689-691
[10]  
Brockington D., 2002, FORTRESS CONSERVATIO