Risk of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study

被引:54
作者
Albertsen, Ida Ehlers [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nielsen, Peter Bronnum [1 ,2 ]
Sogaard, Mette [1 ,2 ]
Goldhaber, Samuel Zachary [3 ]
Overvad, Thure Filskov [2 ]
Rasmussen, Lars Hvilsted [4 ]
Larsen, Torben Bjerregaard [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Sondre Skovvej 15, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Aalborg Univ, Aalborg Thrombosis Res Unit, Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Cardiovasc Med, Boston, MA USA
[4] Aalborg Univ, Fac Med, Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
Cancer Recurrence; Provoked; Unprovoked; Venous thromboembolism; THROMBOSIS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.04.042
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to estimate recurrence risk after incident venous thromboembolism, stratified according to unprovoked, provoked, and cancer-related venous thromboembolism in a prospective cohort of inpatients and outpatients receiving routine care. METHODS: We linked nationwide Danish health registries to identify all patients with incident venous thromboembolism from January 2000 through December 2015. Rates of recurrence were calculated and Cox regression was used to compute hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by incident venous thromboembolism type after adjusting for coexisting risk factors. RESULTS: The study included 73,993 patients with incident venous thromboembolism (54.1% females; mean age, 62.3 years). At 6-month follow-up, rates per 100 person-years were 6.80, 6.92, and 9.06 for provoked, unprovoked, and cancer-related venous thromboembolism, respectively. At 10-year follow-up, corresponding rates were 2.22, 2.84, and 3.70, respectively. Additionally, at 6-month follow-up, hazard rates of recurrence were comparable for patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism 1.01 (95% CI, 0.92-1.11) and provoked. At 10-year follow-up, unprovoked venous thromboembolism (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.12-1.23) and cancer -related venous thromboembolism (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.12-1.32) were associated with higher risk of recurrence compared with that found in provoked venous thromboembolism. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide cohort, patients with cancer -related venous thromboembolism had the highest risk of recurrence. At 6-month follow-up, there were similar risks of recurrence for patients with unprovoked and provoked venous thromboembolism. At 10-year follow-up, recurrence risks were similar for patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism and patients with cancer -related venous thromboembolism. High recurrence risks in all categories indicate that further research is needed to optimize duration of extended anticoagulation for these patients. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1067 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Recurrence and mortality after first venous thromboembolism in a large population-based cohort [J].
Arshad, N. ;
Bjori, E. ;
Hindberg, K. ;
Isaksen, T. ;
Hansen, J. -B. ;
Braekkan, S. K. .
JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2017, 15 (02) :295-303
[2]   Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Lee, Douglas S. ;
Fine, Jason P. .
CIRCULATION, 2016, 133 (06) :601-609
[3]   Incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism in relation to clinical and thrombophilic risk factors: prospective cohort study [J].
Baglin, T ;
Luddington, R ;
Brown, K ;
Baglin, C .
LANCET, 2003, 362 (9383) :523-526
[4]   Systematic Review: Case-Fatality Rates of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism and Major Bleeding Events Among Patients Treated for Venous Thromboembolism [J].
Carrier, Marc ;
Le Gal, Gregoire ;
Wells, Philip S. ;
Rodger, Marc A. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 152 (09) :578-+
[5]   Retrospective evaluation of venous thromboembolism: Are all transient provoking events the same? [J].
Chua, Chong Chyn ;
Lim, Hui Yin ;
Tacey, Mark ;
Nandurkar, Harshal ;
Ho, Prahlad .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2017, 99 (01) :18-26
[6]   Systematic review of prognostic models for recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) post-treatment of first unprovoked VTE [J].
Ensor, Joie ;
Riley, Richard D. ;
Moore, David ;
Snell, Kym I. E. ;
Bayliss, Susan ;
Fitzmaurice, David .
BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (05)
[7]   Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism [J].
Goldhaber, Samuel Z. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 56 (01) :1-7
[8]   A prospective registry of 5,451 patients with ultrasound-confirmed deep vein thrombosis [J].
Goldhaber, SZ ;
Tapson, VF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 93 (02) :259-262
[9]   Prevention of VTE in Nonsurgical Patients Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines [J].
Kahn, Susan R. ;
Lim, Wendy ;
Dunn, Andrew S. ;
Cushman, Mary ;
Dentali, Francesco ;
Akl, Elie A. ;
Cook, Deborah J. ;
Balekian, Alex A. ;
Klein, Russell C. ;
Le, Hoang ;
Schulman, Sam ;
Murad, M. Hassan .
CHEST, 2012, 141 (02) :E195S-E226S
[10]   Categorization of patients as having provoked or unprovoked venous thromboembolism: guidance from the SSC of ISTH [J].
Kearon, C. ;
Ageno, W. ;
Cannegieter, S. C. ;
Cosmi, B. ;
Geersing, G-J. ;
Kyrle, P. A. .
JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2016, 14 (07) :1480-1483