Glenohumeral joint internal and external rotation range of motion in elite junior tennis players

被引:117
作者
Ellenbecker, TS [1 ]
Roetert, EP [1 ]
Piorkowski, PA [1 ]
Schulz, DA [1 ]
机构
[1] US TENNIS ASSOC, MIAMI, FL USA
关键词
shoulder; joint motion; tennis;
D O I
10.2519/jospt.1996.24.6.336
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective measurement of range of motion of the glenohumeral joint is important for the rehabilitation and prevention of shoulder injury. The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether significant differences exist between the dominant (tennis playing) and nondominant extremity in active internal and external rotation range of motion in elite junior tennis players 11-17 years of age. Two hundred three elite junior tennis players (113 males, 90 females) were bilaterally measured for internal and external rotation at 90 degrees of abduction in a supine position with a specific methodology attempting to isolate glenohumeral motion, while minimizing or negating scapulothoracic motion. A standard universal goniometer was utilized to measure active range of motion (AROM). Dependent t rests were used to compare differences between extremities. No significant difference was found for males or females between the dominant and nondominant arm in external rotation. Analysis of internal rotation (AROM) differences showed significantly less (p < .001) internal rotation (AROM) on the dominant arm for both males and females. Significantly less (p < .001) dominant arm total rotational range of motion was also found in both males and females. The loss of dominant arm internal rotation (AROM) has clinical application for both the development of rehabilitation and preventative flexibility/range of motion programs.
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 341
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
*AM AC ORTH SURG, 1994, CLIN MEAS JOINT MOT
[2]  
American Educational Research Association American Psychological Association National Council on Measurement in Education, 2014, Standards for educational and psychological testing
[3]  
BENKIBLER W, 1988, CLIN SPORT MED, V7, P403
[4]  
Chandler T. J., 1995, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, V27, pS25
[5]   FLEXIBILITY COMPARISONS OF JUNIOR ELITE TENNIS PLAYERS TO OTHER ATHLETES [J].
CHANDLER, TJ ;
KIBLER, WB ;
UHL, TL ;
WOOTEN, B ;
KISER, A ;
STONE, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1990, 18 (02) :134-136
[6]   UPPER EXTREMITY RANGE OF MOTION, GRIP STRENGTH, AND GIRTH IN HIGHLY SKILLED TENNIS PLAYERS [J].
CHINN, CJ ;
PRIEST, JD ;
KENT, BE .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1974, 54 (05) :474-482
[7]   FUNCTIONAL-ANATOMY OF THE SHOULDER COMPLEX [J].
CULHAM, E ;
PEAT, M .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1993, 18 (01) :342-350
[8]  
Davies G J, 1981, Phys Sportsmed, V9, P82, DOI 10.1080/00913847.1981.11711099
[9]   BIOMECHANICS OF PITCHING WITH EMPHASIS UPON SHOULDER KINEMATICS [J].
DILLMAN, CJ ;
FLEISIG, GS ;
ANDREWS, JR .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1993, 18 (02) :402-408
[10]  
DILLMAN CJ, 1991, NAT M US TENN ASS TU