Determination of an occupational exposure guideline for manganese using the benchmark method

被引:33
作者
Clewell, HJ
Lawrence, GA
Calne, DB
Crump, KS
机构
[1] Environ Int Corp, Ruston, LA 71270 USA
[2] Ctr Neurodegenerat Disorders, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada
关键词
benchmark dose; manganese; occupational; risk assessment;
D O I
10.1111/1539-6924.00379
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
An occupational risk assessment for manganese (Mn) was performed based on benchmark dose analysis of data from two epidemiological studies providing dose-response information regarding the potential neurological effects of exposure to airborne Mn below the current Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Permissible Exposure Level (PEL) of 5 mg Mn/m(3). Based on a review of the scientific evidence regarding the toxicity of Mn, it was determined that the most appropriate measure of exposure to airborne Mn for the subclinical effects measured in these studies is recent (rather than historical or cumulative) concentration of Mn in respirable (rather than total) particulate. For each of the studies analyzed, the individual exposure and response data from the original study had been made available by the investigators. From these two studies benchmark concentrations calculated for eight endpoints ranged from 0.09 to 0.27 mg Mn/m(3). From our evaluation of these results, and considering the fact that the subtle, subclinical effects represented by the neurological endpoints tested in these studies do not represent material impairment, we believe an appropriate occupational exposure guideline for manganese would be in the range of 0.1 to 0.3 mg Mn/m(3), based on the respirable particulate fraction only, and expressed as an 8-hour time-weighted average.
引用
收藏
页码:1031 / 1046
页数:16
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   DOSE-RESPONSE ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY .2. COMPARISON OF GENERIC BENCHMARK DOSE ESTIMATES WITH NO OBSERVED ADVERSE EFFECT LEVELS [J].
ALLEN, BC ;
KAVLOCK, RJ ;
KIMMEL, CA ;
FAUSTMAN, EM .
FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1994, 23 (04) :487-495
[2]  
Andersen ME, 1999, NEUROTOXICOLOGY, V20, P161
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, THRESH LIM VAL CHEM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, CHANG ENH REL 6 11 1
[5]  
*ATSDR, 1995, AD ENV NEUR TEST BAT
[6]  
ATSDR-Agency for toxic substances & disease registry, 2000, TOX PROF MANG
[7]  
BERNHEIMER H, 1973, J NEUROL SCI, V20, P415, DOI 10.1016/0022-510X(73)90175-5
[8]  
BEUTER A, 1994, NEUROTOXICOLOGY, V15, P655
[9]   MANGANISM AND IDIOPATHIC PARKINSONISM - SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES [J].
CALNE, DB ;
CHU, NS ;
HUANG, CC ;
LU, CS ;
OLANOW, W .
NEUROLOGY, 1994, 44 (09) :1583-1586
[10]   NEUROBEHAVIORAL FUNCTIONS AMONG WORKERS EXPOSED TO MANGANESE ORE [J].
CHIA, SE ;
FOO, SC ;
GAN, SL ;
JEYARATNAM, J ;
TIAN, CS .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1993, 19 (04) :264-270