Socialism against markets? A critique of two recent proposals

被引:16
作者
Hodgson, GM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Judge Inst Management Studies, Cambridge CB2 1TN, England
关键词
socialism; planning; markets; knowledge; learning; innovation;
D O I
10.1080/03085149800000027
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The debate over the feasibility of socialism has lasted for much of the twentieth century. This essay evaluates two important recent proposals for systems of socialist planning in which markets are given merely a marginal role. Beforehand, some of the key theoretical issues are placed in the contest of the 'socialist calculation debate' that lasted from the 1920s to the 1940s. It is argued that the Austrian critics of centralist socialism rightly focused on questions of information and knowledge, and similar considerations also undermine the two recent proposals under review. However, a full appreciation of the role of learning in a knowledge-intensive economy also challenges some of the presuppositions of market individualism.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 433
页数:27
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Adaman F, 1997, NEW LEFT REV, P54
[2]   The economic calculation debate: Lessons for socialists [J].
Adaman, F ;
Devine, P .
CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1996, 20 (05) :523-537
[3]  
ADAMAN F, 1994, STUDIES POLITICAL EC, V43, P63
[4]  
ADAMAN F, 1996, STUDIES POLITICAL EC, V49, P163
[5]  
Aganbegyan A, 1988, CHALLENGE EC PERESTR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Economics and Utopia: Why the Learning Economy Is Not the End of History
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1992, MARX MISES POST CAPI
[8]   CRITIQUE OF LABOR VALUES FOR PLANNING [J].
BAISCH, H .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1979, 7 (10) :965-972
[9]  
BLACKBURN R, 1991, NEW LEFT REV, P5
[10]  
Brus W., 1989, MARX MARKET SOCIALIS