Detection of lung cancer by automated sputum cytometry

被引:47
作者
Kemp, Roger A. [1 ]
Reinders, Daniel M. [1 ]
Turic, Bojana [1 ]
机构
[1] Perceptronix Med Inc, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
early diagnosis; lung neoplasms; image cytometry; cytology;
D O I
10.1097/JTO.0b013e318158d488
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Introduction: Biomarkers may prove to be valuable tools to manage those at risk of lung cancer. Sputum analysis using DNA cytometry has shown promise, but an automated, objective sputum analysis test has yet to be developed. This study evaluated the performance characteristics of the LungSign test for lung cancer and compared them to conventional cytology. Methods: A multicenter validation trial was conducted in which sputum specimens were prospectively collected from subjects suspected of having lung cancer during diagnostic workup. Specimens were placed on slides, DNA stained using Feulgen thionin, and analyzed using an automated cytometry-based scoring system. Smears were also prepared from the sputum specimens, stained by the Papanicolaou procedure, and analyzed using conventional cytology. LungSign scores and conventional cytology results were compared with the subject diagnoses. Results: A total of 1235 high-risk subjects were enrolled at nine clinical sites. Of 1123 subjects included for analysis, 370 were found to have lung cancer-a 33% prevalence. The a priori selected LungSign score threshold detected 40% of all lung cancers and 35% of stage I lung cancers with 91% specificity. Test performance was statistically equivalent across cancer stages, histologic types, and localizations for 330 analyzable lung cancer subjects. LungSign receiver operating characteristic area under the curve measure for the test was 0.692. Conventional cytology detected 16% of lung cancers with 99% specificity. Conclusions: DNA cytometry of sputum using the LungSign test detects stage I lung cancer and may provide a new tool to manage high-risk individuals.
引用
收藏
页码:993 / 1000
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]
Induced sputum cell counts in healthy adults [J].
Belda, J ;
Leigh, R ;
Parameswaran, K ;
O'Byrne, PM ;
Sears, MR ;
Hargreave, FE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 161 (02) :475-478
[2]
BIBBO M, 1990, CANCER RES, V50, P147
[3]
BURGER G, 1981, ANAL QUANT CYTOL, V3, P261
[4]
Lung cancer screening - Where we are in 2004 (take home messages) [J].
Deppermann, KM .
LUNG CANCER, 2004, 45 :S39-S42
[5]
Doudkine A., 1995, Pathologica (Genoa), V87, P286
[6]
Duesberg P, 2004, CELL CYCLE, V3, P823
[7]
Induced sputum, eosinophilic bronchitis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [J].
Hargreave, FE ;
Leigh, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 160 (05) :S53-S57
[8]
Fourth updated ESACP consensus report on diagnostic DNA image cytometry [J].
Haroske, G ;
Baak, JPA ;
Danielsen, H ;
Giroud, F ;
Gschwendtner, A ;
Oberholzer, M ;
Reith, A ;
Spieler, P ;
Böcking, A .
ANALYTICAL CELLULAR PATHOLOGY, 2001, 23 (02) :89-95
[9]
Henschke CI, 2006, NEW ENGL J MED, V355, P1763, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa060476
[10]
Malignancy associated changes in bronchial epithelial cells and clinical application as a biomarker [J].
Ikeda, N ;
MacAulay, C ;
Lam, S ;
LeRiche, J ;
Payne, P ;
Garner, D ;
Konaka, C ;
Kato, H ;
Palcic, B .
LUNG CANCER, 1998, 19 (03) :161-166