Ab initio protein structure prediction using Chunk-TASSER

被引:63
作者
Zhou, Hongyi [1 ]
Skolnick, Jeffrey [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Biol, Ctr Study Syst Biol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1529/biophysj.107.109959
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
We have developed an ab initio protein structure prediction method called chunk-TASSER that uses ab initio folded supersecondary structure chunks of a given target as well as threading templates for obtaining contact potentials and distance restraints. The predicted chunks, selected on the basis of a new fragment comparison method, are folded by a fragment insertion method. Full-length models are built and refined by the TASSER methodology, which searches conformational space via parallel hyperbolic Monte Carlo. We employ an optimized reduced force field that includes knowledge-based statistical potentials and restraints derived from the chunks as well as threading templates. The method is tested on a dataset of 425 hard target proteins <= 250 amino acids in length. The average TM-scores of the best of top five models per target are 0.266, 0.336, and 0.362 by the threading algorithm SP3, original TASSER and chunk-TASSER, respectively. For a subset of 80 proteins with predicted alpha-helix content >= 50%, these averages are 0.284, 0.356, and 0.403, respectively. The percentages of proteins with the best of top five models having TM-score >= 0.4 ( a statistically significant threshold for structural similarity) are 3.76, 20.94, and 28.94% by SP3, TASSER, and chunk-TASSER, respectively, overall, while for the subset of 80 predominantly helical proteins, these percentages are 2.50, 23.75, and 41.25%. Thus, chunk-TASSER shows a significant improvement over TASSER for modeling hard targets where no good template can be identified. We also tested chunk-TASSER on 21 medium/hard targets, 200 amino-acids-long from CASP7. Chunk-TASSER is similar to 11% (10%) better than TASSER for the total TM-score of the first ( best of top five) models. Chunk-TASSER is fully automated and can be used in proteome scale protein structure prediction.
引用
收藏
页码:1510 / 1518
页数:9
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs [J].
Altschul, SF ;
Madden, TL ;
Schaffer, AA ;
Zhang, JH ;
Zhang, Z ;
Miller, W ;
Lipman, DJ .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1997, 25 (17) :3389-3402
[2]   BASIC LOCAL ALIGNMENT SEARCH TOOL [J].
ALTSCHUL, SF ;
GISH, W ;
MILLER, W ;
MYERS, EW ;
LIPMAN, DJ .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1990, 215 (03) :403-410
[3]   Protein structure prediction and structural genomics [J].
Baker, D ;
Sali, A .
SCIENCE, 2001, 294 (5540) :93-96
[4]  
BEMSTEIN FC, 1977, J MOL BIOL, V112, P535
[5]   Functional inferences from blind ab initio protein structure predictions [J].
Bonneau, R ;
Tsai, J ;
Ruczinski, I ;
Baker, D .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2001, 134 (2-3) :186-190
[6]  
BORREGUERO J, 2007, IN PRESS PROTIENS
[7]   A hierarchical multiscale approach to protein structure prediction: Production of low-resolution packing arrangements of helices and refinement of the best models with a united-residue force field [J].
Chinchio, M. ;
Czaplewski, C. ;
Oldziej, S. ;
Scheraga, H. A. .
MULTISCALE MODELING & SIMULATION, 2006, 5 (04) :1175-1195
[8]   A global optimization strategy for predicting α-helical protein tertiary structure [J].
Crivelli, S ;
Byrd, R ;
Eskow, E ;
Schnabe, R ;
Yu, R ;
Philip, TM ;
Head-Gordon, T .
COMPUTERS & CHEMISTRY, 2000, 24 (3-4) :489-497
[9]   International Functional Electrical Stimulation Society (IFESS): the development of controlled neural prostheses for functional restoration [J].
Davis, R .
NEUROMODULATION, 2000, 3 (01) :1-5
[10]   Structure-based evaluation of sequence comparison and fold recognition alignment accuracy [J].
Domingues, FS ;
Lackner, P ;
Andreeva, A ;
Sippl, MJ .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2000, 297 (04) :1003-1013