Maternal obesity and risk of cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis

被引:359
作者
Chu, S. Y.
Kim, S. Y.
Schmid, C. H.
Dietz, P. M.
Callaghan, W. M.
Lau, J.
Curtis, K. M.
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Reprod Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
[2] Tufts Univ, New England Med Ctr, Inst Clin Res & Hlth Policy Studies, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
Cesarean delivery; maternal obesity; pregnancy; reproductive outcomes;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00397.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Despite numerous studies reporting an increased risk of cesarean delivery among overweight or obese compared with normal weight women, the magnitude of the association remains uncertain. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of the current literature to provide a quantitative estimate of this association. We identified studies from three sources: (i) a PubMed search of relevant articles published between January 1980 and September 2005; (ii) reference lists of publications selected from the search; and (iii) reference lists of review articles published between 2000 and 2005. We included cohort designed studies that reported obesity measures reflecting pregnancy body mass, had a normal weight comparison group, and presented data allowing a quantitative measurement of risk. We used a Bayesian random effects model to perform the meta-analysis and meta-regression. Thirty-three studies were included. The unadjusted odd ratios of a cesarean delivery were 1.46 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-1.60], 2.05 (95% CI: 1.86-2.27) and 2.89 (95% CI: 2.28-3.79) among overweight, obese and severely obese women, respectively, compared with normal weight pregnant women. The meta-regression found no evidence that these estimates were affected by selected study characteristics. Our findings provide a quantitative estimate of the risk of cesarean delivery associated with high maternal body mass.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 394
页数:10
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
*ACOG, 2005, OBSTET GYNECOL, V106, P671, DOI DOI 10.1097/00006250-200509000-00054
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, METAANALYSIS DECISIO
[3]   Pregnancy complications and outcomes among overweight and obese nulliparous women [J].
Baeten, JM ;
Bukusi, EA ;
Lambe, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 91 (03) :436-440
[4]   Maternal prepregnant body mass index, duration of breastfeeding, and timing of complementary food introduction are associated with infant weight gain [J].
Baker, JL ;
Michaelsen, KF ;
Rasmussen, KM ;
Sorensen, TIA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2004, 80 (06) :1579-1588
[5]   Pregnancy outcome and weight gain recommendations for the morbidly obese woman [J].
Bianco, AT ;
Smilen, TW ;
Davis, Y ;
Lopez, S ;
Lapinski, R ;
Lockwood, CJ .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 91 (01) :97-102
[6]   Obesity or diabetes: what is worse for the mother and for the baby? [J].
Bo, S ;
Menato, G ;
Signorile, A ;
Bardelli, C ;
Lezo, A ;
Gallo, ML ;
Gambino, R ;
Cassader, M ;
Massobrio, M ;
Pagano, G .
DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2003, 29 (02) :175-178
[7]   Maternal morbidity associated with vaginal versus cesarean delivery [J].
Burrows, LJ ;
Meyn, LA ;
Weber, AM .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (05) :907-912
[8]   Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes compared with the general obstetric population [J].
Casey, BM ;
Lucas, MJ ;
McIntire, DD ;
Leveno, KJ .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 90 (06) :869-873
[9]   Maternal morbid obesity and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome [J].
Cedergren, MI .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (02) :219-224
[10]   Mode of delivery for the morbidly obese with prior cesarean delivery: Vaginal versus repeat cesarean section [J].
Chauhan, SP ;
Magann, EF ;
Carroll, CS ;
Barrilleaux, PS ;
Scardo, JA ;
Martin, JN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (02) :349-353