Do self-help interventions in health education lead to cognitive changes, and do cognitive changes lead to behavioural change?

被引:30
作者
Dijkstra, A
De Vries, H
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Dept Clin & Hlth Psychol, NL-2300 RB Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Hlth Educ, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1348/135910701169106
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objectives. The present study examined the extent to which self-help interventions change specific cognitions and the extent to which changes in such cognitions are related to behavioural changes. Design. A randomized field experiment with follow-ups after 2 weeks and 3 months. M Method. Smokers (N = 1546) were randomly assigned to one of four conditions offering smoking cessation self-help materials containing (1) outcome information, (2) self-efficacy enhancing information, (3) both sores of information, or (4) no information. Results. First, with regard to behavioural effects, only self-help interventions that included self-efficacy enhancing information were more effective than no information. Second, with regard to the cognitive changes, the data showed that outcome information led to increase in expected positive outcomes but also to increases in self-efficacy expectations, Further, self-efficacy-enhancing information led to increases in self-efficacy. Third, different cognitive changes between T1 and T2 were related to different types of quitting activity at T3 in different groups of smokers. Conclusions. Some types of information lead to specific cognitive changes, while other types have more generalized cognitive effects. Further, cognitive changes produced by a serf-help intervention predict future quitting activity.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 134
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HELPING HARD CORE SM
[2]  
[Anonymous], HLTH PSYCHOL
[3]  
[Anonymous], EXERCISE CONTROL
[4]  
BANDURA A, 1986, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A
[5]  
BARTON J, 1982, CHILD DEV, V53, P1499, DOI 10.2307/1130077
[6]   Which adolescent experimenters progress to established smoking in the United States [J].
Choi, WS ;
Pierce, JP ;
Gilpin, EA ;
Farkas, AJ ;
Berry, CC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1997, 13 (05) :385-391
[7]   SELF-EFFICACY AND CESSATION OF SMOKING [J].
COELHO, RJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1984, 54 (01) :309-310
[8]   DEBUNKING MYTHS ABOUT SELF-QUITTING - EVIDENCE FROM 10 PROSPECTIVE STUDIES OF PERSONS WHO ATTEMPT TO QUIT SMOKING BY THEMSELVES [J].
COHEN, S ;
LICHTENSTEIN, E ;
PROCHASKA, JO ;
ROSSI, JS ;
GRITZ, ER ;
CARR, CR ;
ORLEANS, CT ;
SCHOENBACH, VJ ;
BIENER, L ;
ABRAMS, D ;
DICLEMENTE, C ;
CURRY, S ;
MARLATT, GA ;
CUMMINGS, KM ;
EMONT, SL ;
GIOVINO, G ;
OSSIPKLEIN, D .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1989, 44 (11) :1355-1365
[9]   FORMAT AND QUITTING INSTRUCTIONS AS FACTORS INFLUENCING THE IMPACT OF A SELF-ADMINISTERED QUIT SMOKING PROGRAM [J].
CUMMINGS, KM ;
EMONT, SL ;
JAEN, C ;
SCIANDRA, R .
HEALTH EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 1988, 15 (02) :199-216
[10]   A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF SELF-HELP MATERIALS, PERSONALIZED FEEDBACK, AND TELEPHONE COUNSELING WITH NONVOLUNTEER SMOKERS [J].
CURRY, SJ ;
MCBRIDE, C ;
GROTHAUS, LC ;
LOUIE, D ;
WAGNER, EH .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 63 (06) :1005-1014