Laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy - Learning curve of a laparoscopy-naive urologist in a community hospital

被引:26
作者
Martina, GR [1 ]
Giumelli, P
Scuzzarella, S
Remotti, M
Caruso, G
Lovisolo, J
机构
[1] Osped Sondalo, Dept Urol, Azienda Osped Valtellina & Valchiavenna, I-23035 Sondalo, Italy
[2] Osped Galmarini, Serv Urol, Tradate, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2004.11.019
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To describe the training approach that a laparoscopy-naive general urologist working in a nonteaching hospital used to successfully learn to perform laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and describe the results obtained in the first 1 14 cases performed. Methods. The urologist assisted an experienced laparoscopic surgeon for 20 extraperitoneal radical prostatectomies. During this time, he modified his technique of performing open radical retropubic prostatectomy to facilitate the acquisition of the laparoscopic techniques. Intracorporeal suturing was learned with the aid of a pelvic trainer. The clinical records of the first consecutive 114 cases were examined to evaluate the outcomes in terms of morbidity and oncological and functional concerns. A similar analysis was performed on a subgroup of 15 patients who had undergone laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy after previous transurethral resection of the prostate. Results. The operating time progressively decreased during the learning curve. The mean duration of surgery was 160 minutes. Two conversions to open surgery were required owing to failure to progress. Of the 1 14 patients, 14% experienced complications, most of which were minor. The positive surgical margin rate was 17%. The average follow-up was 16 months. Undetectable serum prostate-specific antigen levels were observed in 82%, 87%, and 79% at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively; 96% of patients used 0 to I pad per day for incontinence at 6 months of follow-up. The results in the transurethral resection subgroup were similar. Conclusions. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy can be successfully learned by a general urologist with no prior laparoscopic experience. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:959 / 963
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: Initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Ahlering, TE
    Skarecky, D
    Lee, D
    Clayman, RV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (05) : 1738 - 1741
  • [2] Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: A prospective comparison of functional outcome
    Anastasiadis, AG
    Salomon, L
    Katz, R
    Hoznek, A
    Chopin, D
    Abbou, CC
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2003, 62 (02) : 292 - 297
  • [3] Is laparoscopic radical prostatectomy better than traditional retropubic radical prostatectomy? An analysis of peri-operative morbidity in two contemporary series in Italy
    Artibani, W
    Grosso, G
    Novara, G
    Pecoraro, G
    Sidoti, O
    Sarti, A
    Ficarra, V
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 44 (04) : 401 - 406
  • [4] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A multi-institutional study of conversion to open surgery
    Bhayani, SB
    Pavlovich, CP
    Strup, SE
    Dahl, DM
    Landman, J
    Fabrizio, MD
    Sundaram, CP
    Kaouk, JH
    Su, LM
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2004, 63 (01) : 99 - 102
  • [5] Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - Results after 50 cases
    Bollens, R
    Vanden Bossche, M
    Roumeguere, T
    Damoun, A
    Ekane, S
    Hoffmann, P
    Zlotta, AR
    Schulman, CC
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 40 (01) : 65 - 69
  • [6] Perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with open radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Brown, JA
    Garlitz, C
    Gomella, LG
    McGinnis, DE
    Diamond, SM
    Strup, SE
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2004, 22 (02) : 102 - 106
  • [7] Pathologic comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens
    Brown, JA
    Garlitz, C
    Gomella, LG
    Hubosky, SG
    Diamond, SM
    McGinnis, D
    Strup, SE
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2003, 62 (03) : 481 - 486
  • [8] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial 70 cases at a US university medical center
    Dahl, DM
    L'esperance, JO
    Trainer, AF
    Jiang, Z
    Gallagher, K
    Litwin, DEM
    Blute, RD
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (05) : 859 - 863
  • [9] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the initial UK series
    Eden, CG
    Cahill, D
    Vass, JA
    Adams, TH
    Dauleh, MI
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 90 (09) : 876 - 882
  • [10] Positive margins after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective study of 100 cases performed by 4 different surgeons
    El-Feel, A
    Davis, JW
    Deger, S
    Roigas, J
    Wille, AH
    Schnorr, D
    Hakiem, AA
    Loening, S
    Tuerk, IA
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 43 (06) : 622 - 626