Ischemic complications in pedicle, free, and muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps for breast reconstruction

被引:50
作者
Andrades, Patricio [1 ]
Fix, R. Jobe [1 ]
Danilla, Stefan [1 ]
Howell, Robert E. [1 ]
Campbell, William J. [1 ]
De la Torre, Jorge [1 ]
Vasconez, Luis O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Surg, Div Plast Surg, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
breast reconstruction; pedicle TRAM flap; free TRAM flap; muscle sparing TRAM flap;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0b013e31816fc372
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Muscle sparing and perforator flaps techniques for breast reconstruction have focused in reducing the donor site morbidity. Theoretically this may result in a less robust blood supply to the flap. The purpose of this study was to assess flap ischemic complications with the pedicle, free, and the different muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAMs) flaps for breast reconstruction and determine the factors associated with these complications. A total of 301 consecutive patients that underwent 399 breast reconstructions were retrospectively reviewed. Patient, oncologic, and reconstruction data were recorded. A flap ischemic complication scale was design including: wound healing problems, skin flap necrosis, fat necrosis, partial flap loss, and total flap loss. Analysis of donor site complications, bilateral and unilateral reconstructions were also performed. There were 147 pedicle TRAM and 154 free TRAM with the following subgroup distribution: MS-0 = 102; MS-1 = 37; and MS-2 = 15 patients. The groups were comparable in relation to age, comorbidities, cancer stage, and treatment. The overall complication rate after reconstruction had no statistical differences between the groups. The variables related to flap ischemia were statistically lower in the free TRAM. Mild and severe fat necrosis were the indicators with a statistical difference. The MS-0 group had lower ischemic complications and fat necrosis than the pedicled group, but no differences were observed for the MS-1 and MS-2 groups. The same results were seen in the unilateral reconstructions but not in the bilateral ones. No differences in donor site bulging or hernia were observed between the groups. In our study, the free TRAM flap demonstrated lower ischemic complications than the pedicle TRAM. A trend for decreased flap blood supply when more muscle is preserved and less number of perforators are used with a constant tissue volume was observed.
引用
收藏
页码:562 / 567
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: Two-year results of the Michigan breast reconstruction outcome study [J].
Alderman, AK ;
Wilkins, EG ;
Kim, HM ;
Lowery, JC .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 109 (07) :2265-2274
[2]  
Bajaj AK, 2006, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V117, P737, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000200062.97265.fb
[3]   Venous congestion and blood flow in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps [J].
Blondeel, PN ;
Arnstein, M ;
Verstraete, K ;
Depuydt, K ;
Van Landuyt, KH ;
Monstrey, SJ ;
Kroll, SS .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 106 (06) :1295-1299
[4]   The donor site morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction [J].
Blondeel, PN ;
Vanderstraeten, GG ;
Monstrey, SJ ;
VanLanduyt, K ;
Tonnard, P ;
Lysens, R ;
Boeckx, WD ;
Matton, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1997, 50 (05) :322-330
[5]   THE VASCULAR TERRITORIES OF THE SUPERIOR EPIGASTRIC AND THE DEEP INFERIOR EPIGASTRIC SYSTEMS [J].
BOYD, JB ;
TAYLOR, GI ;
CORLETT, R .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1984, 73 (01) :1-14
[6]  
Edsander-Nord Å, 2001, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V107, P1142
[7]   A retrospective comparison of abdominal muscle strength following breast reconstruction with a free TRAM or DIEP flap [J].
Futter, CM ;
Webster, MHC ;
Hagen, S ;
Mitchell, SL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2000, 53 (07) :578-583
[8]  
Garvey PB, 2006, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V117, P1711, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000210679.77449.7d
[9]   A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction [J].
Gill, PS ;
Hunt, JP ;
Guerra, AB ;
Dellacroce, FJ ;
Sullivan, SK ;
Boraski, J ;
Metzinger, SE ;
Dupin, CL ;
Allen, RJ .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 113 (04) :1153-1160
[10]   CONVENTIONAL TRAM FLAP VERSUS FREE MICROSURGICAL TRAM FLAP FOR IMMEDIATE BREAST RECONSTRUCTION [J].
GROTTING, JC ;
URIST, MM ;
MADDOX, WA ;
VASCONEZ, LO .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1989, 83 (05) :828-841