The rise of 'new' policy instruments in comparative perspective: Has governance eclipsed government?

被引:324
作者
Jordan, A [1 ]
Wurzel, RKW
Zito, A
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, CSERGE, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[2] Univ Hull, Dept Polit & Int Studies, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
[3] Newcastle Univ, Sch Geog Polit & Sociol, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00540.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Governance is a term in good currency, but there are still too few detailed empirical analyses of the precise extent to which it has or has not eclipsed government. This article explores the temporal and spatial characteristics of the governance transition by charting the deployment of new policy instruments in eight industrialised states and the European Union. The adoption and implementation of ('old' and 'new') policy instruments offer a useful analytical touchstone because governance theory argues that regulation is the quintessence of government. Although there are many 'new' environmental policy instruments in these nine jurisdictions, this article finds that the change from government to governance is highly differentiated across political jurisdictions, policy sectors and even the main instrument types. Crucially, many of the new policy instruments used require some state involvement (that is, 'government'), and very few are entirely devoid of state involvement (that is, pure 'governance'). Far from eclipsing government, governance therefore often complements and, on some occasions, even competes with it, although there are some cases of fusion. Future research should thus explore the many complex and varied ways in which government and governance interact in public policy-making.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 496
页数:20
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Andeweg R. B., 2003, GOVERNING EUROPE, P39
[2]  
[Anonymous], EC INSTR POLL CONTR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, ENV POLICY EUROPE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, NEW INSTRUMENTS ENV
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, COMMON GOODS REINVEN
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1995, GESELLSCHAFTLICHE SE
[7]  
ARMSTRONG KennethA., 2000, Regulation, deregulation, re-regulation
[9]  
Bevir M.Rhodes., 2003, INTERPRETING BRIT GO
[10]  
BORKEY P, 1998, ENVEPOCGEEI9829FINAL