A comparison of the use of Papanicolaou-stained cervical cytological smears with Gram-stained vaginal smears for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy

被引:15
作者
Lamont, RF [1 ]
Hudson, EA [1 ]
Hay, PE [1 ]
Morgan, DJ [1 ]
Modi, V [1 ]
Ison, CA [1 ]
Taylor-Robinson, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwick Pk Hosp, Northwick Pk & St Marks NHS Trust, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
关键词
bacterial vaginosis; diagnosis; Gram-stain;
D O I
10.1258/0956462991913709
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Our objective is to compare the efficacy of using Papanicolaou (PAP)stained cervical cytology smears with a standardized method of interpreting Gram-stained vaginal smears for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis (BV) in pregnancy. High vaginal smears were Gram-stained and examined by a single observer to characterize 3 grades of vaginal flora and diagnose BV. Cervical smears were PAP-stained and examined for characteristic patterns of vaginal flora including evidence of BV by either a number of cytotechnicians or a single cytopathologist. The results of the 2 methods were compared. Seven hundred and forty-seven women attending an antenatal clinic in a district general hospital who consented to have a smear of vaginal secretions and cervical cytology in early pregnancy. The main outcome measure is the diagnosis of BV by different methods in a pregnant population. Compared with the Gram-stain method for the diagnosis of BV, there was good agreement between PAP-stain interpretation by a single observer but the agreement was not as good with PAP-stain interpretation by multiple cytotechnicians. When the grades were consolidated to normal (grade I) and abnormal flora (grades II and III), compared to Gram-stained smears, PAP cytology undertaken by several cytotechnicians had a sensitivity of 80.7% and a specificity of 90.7%. The sensitivity and specificity increased to 87% and 97%, respectively, when the PAP-stained smears were read by a single cytopathologist. Using kappa scores, only those readings made by a single cytopathologist were reliable. The setting in a cytopathology laboratory comprises multiple cytotechnicians, so that PAP-stain analysis of vaginal smears for the diagnosis of BV is Likely to provide results which are less reliable than those obtained by Gram staining. The latter should be the first choice and every effort should be made to set up this service.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 97
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   NONSPECIFIC VAGINITIS - DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA AND MICROBIAL AND EPIDEMIOLOGIC ASSOCIATIONS [J].
AMSEL, R ;
TOTTEN, PA ;
SPIEGEL, CA ;
CHEN, KCS ;
ESCHENBACH, D ;
HOLMES, KK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 74 (01) :14-22
[2]  
FLEISS IL, 1981, STAT METHODS RATES P
[3]  
GEARY M, 1997, PRETERM LABOR, P51
[4]   Reduced incidence of preterm delivery with metronidazole and erythromycin in women with bacterial vaginosis [J].
Hauth, JC ;
Goldenberg, RL ;
Andrews, WW ;
DuBard, MB ;
Copper, RL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 333 (26) :1732-1736
[5]   DIAGNOSIS OF BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS IN A GYNECOLOGY CLINIC [J].
HAY, PE ;
TAYLORROBINSON, D ;
LAMONT, RF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1992, 99 (01) :63-66
[6]   ABNORMAL BACTERIAL-COLONIZATION OF THE GENITAL-TRACT AND SUBSEQUENT PRETERM DELIVERY AND LATE MISCARRIAGE [J].
HAY, PE ;
LAMONT, RF ;
TAYLORROBINSON, D ;
MORGAN, DJ ;
ISON, C ;
PEARSON, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6924) :295-298
[7]  
LAMONT RF, 1995, YB ROYAL COLL OBSTET, P149
[8]   INCIDENCE OF PELVIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASE AFTER 1ST-TRIMESTER LEGAL-ABORTION IN WOMEN WITH BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS AFTER TREATMENT WITH METRONIDAZOLE - A DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED STUDY [J].
LARSSON, PG ;
PLATZCHRISTENSEN, JJ ;
THEJLS, H ;
FORSUM, U ;
PAHLSON, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 166 (01) :100-103
[9]  
LARSSON PG, 1991, OBSTET GYNECOL, V77, P450
[10]   VAGINAL COLONIZATION WITH GROUP-B BETA-HEMOLYTIC STREPTOCOCCUS AS A RISK FACTOR FOR POST-CESAREAN SECTION FEBRILE MORBIDITY [J].
MINKOFF, HL ;
SIERRA, MF ;
PRINGLE, GF ;
SCHWARZ, RH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1982, 142 (08) :992-995