Barriers to fertility preservation among pediatric oncologists

被引:130
作者
Vadaparampil, Susan [1 ,2 ]
Quinn, Gwendolyn [1 ,2 ]
King, Lindsey [1 ]
Wilson, Crystal [1 ]
Nieder, Michael [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, MRC, CANCONT, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, Tampa, FL USA
[3] All Childrens Hlth Syst, St Petersburg, FL USA
关键词
fertility preservation; pediatric cancer; qualitative research; physician attitudes; cancer survivorship;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2008.05.013
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: Limited research has been conducted on the extent to which fertility preservation is discussed by pediatric oncologists with patients and less is known about the discussion content. This study sought to examine factors that may influence the discussion with pediatric cancer patients and families. Methods: Qualitative data were collected using open-ended, in-depth interviews with 24 pediatric oncologists in Florida at 13 children's cancer centers, representing 87% of the centers in the state. Results: Providers practiced between 0.5 and 35 years, treated most types of pediatric cancers, and most were board certified in pediatric hematology/oncology. The main factors associated with a discussion of fertility preservation options were: (1) physician factors that contribute to communication issues with FP discussion (e.g., awareness and sense of comfort in discussing issues, perceptions of the priority); (2) parent factors (e.g., receptiveness and cultural background); (3) patient factors (e.g., receptiveness and age); and (4) institutional factors (e.g., referral sites and practice guidelines). Conclusions: Pediatric oncologists may benefit from education about fertility preservation options for pediatric cancer patients, particularly females. Practice implications: Training on how to address parents' and patients' emotions, culture, and other factors may also promote the discussion. Although guidelines have been established, barriers related to availability and affordability of resources must also be addressed. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 410
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
*AASOC, 2006, ASCO PAT GUID FERT P
[2]  
ACHILLE MA, 2006, HUM REPROD
[3]  
*ACS, 2006, WILL MY SEX FUNCT FE
[4]   The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: An empirical study [J].
Armstrong, D ;
Gosling, A ;
Weinman, J ;
Marteau, T .
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 31 (03) :597-606
[5]   Fertility preservation of boys undergoing anti-cancer therapy: a review of the existing situation and prospects for the future [J].
Aslam, I ;
Fishel, S ;
Moore, H ;
Dowell, K ;
Thornton, S .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (10) :2154-2159
[6]   Gonadal tissue cryopreservation in boys with paediatric cancers [J].
Bahadur, G ;
Ralph, D .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (01) :11-17
[7]  
BAUMAN LJ, 1993, J DEV BEHAV PEDIATR, V14, P256
[8]  
BISHOP GF, 1988, WILEY S PRO, P321
[9]   The US pediatric cancer clinical trials programmes: International implications and the way forward [J].
Bleyer, WA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 33 (09) :1439-1447
[10]  
Bradlyn Andrew S, 2004, J Pediatr Oncol Nurs, V21, P335, DOI 10.1177/1043454204270250