A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection:: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?

被引:225
作者
Adler, A. [1 ]
Pohl, H. [1 ]
Papanikolaou, I. S. [1 ]
Abou-Rebyeh, H. [1 ]
Schachschal, G. [2 ]
Veltzke-Schlieker, W. [1 ]
Khalifa, A. C. [1 ]
Setka, E. [1 ]
Koch, M. [3 ]
Wiedenmann, B. [1 ]
Roesch, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite Med Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Cent Interdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit, Berlin, Germany
[2] Charite Med Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Berlin, Germany
[3] Charite Med Univ, Dept Pathol, Berlin, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1136/gut.2007.123539
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims: Colonoscopy is an established method of colorectal cancer screening, but has an adenoma miss rate of 10-20%. Detection rates are expected to improve with optimised visualisation methods. This prospective randomised study evaluated narrow-band imaging (NBI), a new technique that may enhance image contrast in colon adenoma detection. Methods: Eligible patients presenting for diagnostic colonoscopy were randomly assigned to undergo wide-angle colonoscopy using either conventional high-resolution imaging or NBI during instrument withdrawal. The primary outcome parameter was the difference in the adenoma detection rate between the two techniques. Results: A total of 401 patients were included (mean age 59.4 years, 52.6% men). Adenomas were detected more frequently in the NBI group (23%) than in the control group (17%) with a number of 17 colonoscopies needed to find one additional adenoma patient; however, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.129). When the two techniques were compared in consecutive subgroups of 100 study patients, adenoma rates in the NBI group remained fairly stable, whereas these rates steadily increased in the control group (8%, 15%, 17%, and 26.5%, respectively). Significant differences in the first 100 cases (26.5% versus 8%; p = 0.02) could not be maintained in the last 100 cases (25.5% versus 26.5%, p = 0.91). Conclusions: The increased adenoma detection rate means of NBI colonoscopy were statistically not significant. It remains speculative as to whether the increasing adenoma rate in the conventional group may have been caused by a training effect of better polyp recognition on NBI.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 64
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
ADLER A, 2007, DIS COLON RECTU 0813
[2]   Accuracy of high-resolution chromoendoscopy in prediction of histologic findings in diminutive lesions of the rectosigmoid [J].
Apel, D ;
Jakobs, R ;
Schilling, D ;
Weickert, U ;
Teichmann, J ;
Bohrer, MH ;
Riemann, JF .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (06) :824-828
[3]   Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy [J].
Barclay, Robert L. ;
Vicari, Joseph J. ;
Doughty, Andrea S. ;
Johanson, John F. ;
Greenlaw, Roger L. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (24) :2533-2541
[4]  
Bensen S, 1999, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V94, P194
[5]   A prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia [J].
Chiu, Han-Mo ;
Chang, Chi-Yang ;
Chen, Chien-Chuan ;
Lee, Yi-Chia ;
Wu, Ming-Shiang ;
Lin, Jaw-Town ;
Shun, Chia-Tung ;
Wang, Hsiu-Po .
GUT, 2007, 56 (03) :373-379
[6]   170° wide-angle colonoscope:: Effect on efficiency and miss rates [J].
Deenadayalu, VP ;
Chadalawada, V ;
Rex, DK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (11) :2138-2142
[7]   Narrow band imaging improves adenoma detection in patients at high risk for adenomas: A randomised trial [J].
East, Jarnes E. ;
Suzuki, Noriko ;
Stavrinidis, Mari ;
Palmer, Nicky ;
Guenther, Thomas ;
Saunders, Brian P. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 65 (05) :AB95-AB95
[8]  
East JE, 2006, ENDOSCOPY S2, V38, pA
[9]   Biopsy surveillance is still necessary in patients with Barrett's oesophagus despite new endoscopic imaging techniques [J].
Egger, K ;
Werner, M ;
Meining, A ;
Ott, R ;
Allescher, HD ;
Höfler, H ;
Classen, M ;
Rösch, T .
GUT, 2003, 52 (01) :18-23
[10]   Effectiveness and patient tolerance of screening colonoscopy -: First results [J].
Hüppe, D ;
Lemberg, L ;
Felten, G .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2004, 42 (07) :591-598