Comparison of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy

被引:121
作者
Grams, Jayleen [1 ]
Tong, Winnie [1 ]
Greenstein, Alex J. [1 ]
Salky, Barry [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10029 USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2010年 / 24卷 / 08期
关键词
Laparoscopy; Colectomy; Anastomosis; Intracorporeal; OPEN COLECTOMY; COLORECTAL RESECTION; COLON-CANCER; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-009-0865-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Laparoscopic-assisted colon resection has been shown to result in earlier return of bowel function, decreased postoperative pain, decreased length of stay, and decreased morbidity when compared to open resection. Laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy often still involves externalization of the bowel for resection and anastomosis. The aim of this study was to determine short-term outcomes of performing intra- versus extracorporeal resection and anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy. Retrospective chart review of 105 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy or colectomy by a single surgeon from January 2006 through August 2008 was performed. Pearson chi(2) and Student's t test were used to test for significance. There were 105 patients in total who underwent laparoscopic-assisted ileocolic resection (66), right hemicolectomy (29), left hemicolectomy (9), and subtotal colectomy (1). There were more males in the extracorporeal group, but patients in the two groups were otherwise demographically comparable. An intracorporeal anastomosis was performed in 54 patients and extracorporeal in 51 patients. The operation was longer in the intracorporeal group (p a parts per thousand currency sign 0.001), but estimated blood loss was less (p = 0.014). Postoperatively, there was no significant difference in time to bowel movement between the intra- and extracorporeal anastomosis groups; however, there was earlier return of flatus (2 vs. 2.4 days, respectively; p = 0.017). Postoperative narcotic use (16 vs. 49 mg morphine equivalents; p = 0.001), length of stay (3.2 vs. 3.8 days; p = 0.012), and perioperative morbidity (6 vs. 15 patients; p = 0.019) were all decreased in the intra- versus extracorporeal group, respectively. There was no perioperative mortality. In comparison to the extracorporeal technique, resection and creation of the anastomosis intracorporeally produces superior results with earlier return of bowel function, decreased postoperative narcotic use, and decreased length of stay and morbidity. Further studies will be needed to verify our findings.
引用
收藏
页码:1886 / 1891
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Hand-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Aalbers, A. G. J. ;
Biere, S. S. A. Y. ;
Henegouwen, M. I. van Berge ;
Bemelman, W. A. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (08) :1769-1780
[2]   Intracorporeal vs laparoscopic-assisted resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis of the sigmoid [J].
Bergamaschi, R ;
Tuetch, JJ ;
Pessaux, P ;
Arnaud, JP .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2000, 14 (06) :520-523
[3]  
Bernstein MA, 1996, AM SURGEON, V62, P507
[4]   Use and outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for cancer in the United States [J].
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Bentrem, Davidj. ;
Nelson, Heidi ;
Stryker, Steven J. ;
Stewart, Andrew K. ;
Soper, Nathaniel J. ;
Russell, Thomas R. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2008, 143 (09) :832-839
[5]  
Bonjer HJ, 2007, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V142, P298
[6]  
Bonjer HJ, 2009, LANCET ONCOL, V10, P44, DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70310-3
[7]   Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer:: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial [J].
Bonjer, HJ ;
Haglind, E ;
Jeekel, I ;
Kazemier, G ;
Páhlman, L ;
Hop, WCJ ;
Veldkamp, R ;
Kuhry, E ;
Haglind, E ;
Pahlman, L ;
Cuesta, MA ;
Msika, S ;
Morino, M ;
Lacy, A ;
Jeekel, I .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (07) :477-484
[8]   Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database [J].
Delaney, Conor P. ;
Chang, Eunice ;
Senagore, Anthony J. ;
Broder, Michael .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 247 (05) :819-824
[9]   Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy [J].
Duepree, HJ ;
Senagore, AJ ;
Delaney, CP ;
Fazio, VW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2003, 197 (02) :177-181
[10]   Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial [J].
Guillou, PJ ;
Quirke, P ;
Thorpe, H ;
Walker, J ;
Jayne, DG ;
Smith, AMH ;
Heath, RM ;
Brown, JM .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9472) :1718-1726