Techno-economic comparison of biomass-to-transportation fuels via pyrolysis, gasification, and biochemical pathways

被引:345
作者
Anex, Robert P. [1 ]
Aden, Andy [3 ]
Kazi, Feroz Kabir [1 ]
Fortman, Joshua [1 ]
Swanson, Ryan M. [1 ]
Wright, Mark M. [1 ]
Satrio, Justinus A. [1 ]
Brown, Robert C. [1 ]
Daugaard, Daren E. [2 ]
Platon, Alex [2 ]
Kothandaraman, Geetha [2 ]
Hsu, David D. [3 ]
Dutta, Abhijit [3 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Ames, IA USA
[2] ConocoPhillips Co, Bartlesville, OK USA
[3] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO USA
关键词
Techno-economics; Biomass; Pyrolysis; Gasification; Biochemical; PRETREATMENT; ETHANOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2010.07.015
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
080707 [能源环境工程]; 082001 [油气井工程];
摘要
This analysis compares capital and operating cost for six near-term biomass-to-liquid fuels technology scenarios representing three conversion platforms: pyrolysis, gasification, and biochemical. These analyses employed similar assumptions to allow comparisons among the results. Most prominently, the feedstock is assumed to be corn stover and plant capacity was 2000 tonne/day for each plant. There are large differences in the total capital investments required among the three platforms. The standalone biomass-to-liquid fuel plants are expected to produce fuels with a product value in the range of $2.00-5.50 per gallon ($0.53-1.45 per liter) gasoline equivalent, with pyrolysis the lowest and biochemical the highest. These relatively high product values are driven primarily by an assumed feedstock cost of $75 per dry ton and the cost of capital for the plants. Pioneer plant analysis, which takes into account increased capital costs and decreased plant performance associated with first-ofa- kind plants, increases estimated product values to $2.00-12.00 per gallon ($0.53-3.17 per liter) gasoline equivalent. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S29 / S35
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
[Anonymous], RANDR2569DOE
[2]
[Anonymous], 2002, LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOM
[3]
[Anonymous], 2005, NRELTP56039181
[4]
*ASP TECHN INC, 2008, ASPENPLUS VER 2006 5
[5]
*CEPCI, 2008, CHEM ENG
[6]
Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle- and long-term [J].
Hamelinck, CN ;
van Hooijdonk, G ;
Faaij, APC .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2005, 28 (04) :384-410
[7]
Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass: Chemistry, catalysts, and engineering [J].
Huber, George W. ;
Iborra, Sara ;
Corma, Avelino .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2006, 106 (09) :4044-4098
[8]
Kalnes T, 2005, DOEGO15085
[9]
Techno-economic comparison of process technologies for biochemical ethanol production from corn stover [J].
Kazi, Feroz Kabir ;
Fortman, Joshua A. ;
Anex, Robert P. ;
Hsu, David D. ;
Aden, Andy ;
Dutta, Abhijit ;
Kothandaraman, Geetha .
FUEL, 2010, 89 :S20-S28
[10]
Knoef HAM, 2005, HDB BIOMASS GASIFICA