Collaborative testing of eddy structure identification methods in free turbulent shear flows

被引:100
作者
Bonnet, JP
Delville, J
Glauser, MN
Antonia, RA
Bisset, DK
Cole, DR
Fiedler, HE
Garem, JH
Hilberg, D
Jeong, J
Kevlahan, NKR
Ukeiley, LS
Vincendeau, E
机构
[1] Univ Poitiers, CEAT, Lab Etud Aerodynam, CNRS,UMR 6609, F-86036 Poitiers, France
[2] Clarkson Univ, Dept Mech & Aeronaut Engn, Potsdam, NY 13699 USA
[3] Univ Newcastle, Dept Mech Engn, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
[4] Tech Univ Berlin, Hermann Fottinger Inst, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[5] Univ Houston, Dept Mech Engn, Houston, TX 77204 USA
[6] Univ Cambridge, Dept Appl Math & Theoret Phys, Cambridge CB3 9EW, England
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s003480050224
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The thrust of this paper is to validate, test and compare several Coherent Structure eduction methods utilizing the same data base. The flow chosen was that of an experimental study of a plane, incompressible, fully developed turbulent two-stream mixing layer. The mixing layer was chosen as the data base because it has been studied extensively from a coherent structures point of view. In addition, its characteristics (similarity, convection velocities, etc.) are well documented. There are also no wall effects so that comparisons between techniques are simplified. The data was collected from hot wire rakes with good spatial resolution thus allowing the contributors to apply and test different structure eduction techniques. The techniques chosen for discussion and used here have found wide utilization over the past decade, and all hold forth the promise of extensive application in the future. These include: Conditional Sampling (Vorticity-based and other methods); Wavelets; Pattern Recognition Analysis; Proper Orthogonal Decomposition; Stochastic Estimation; Topological Concept-based methods; Full Field Methods (e.g., pseudo flow visualization). All are illustrated by application to the mixing layer data base, and comparisons made between the results. This common study has shown that direct comparisons between results of several methods are now possible. Good quantitive and qualitative agreement between the different methods have been observed as well as some differences noted. As an example, the size of the averaged structures computed from the various methods compare to within 6 percent.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 225
页数:29
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
ADRIAN R, 1996, CISM COURSES LECT, V353
[2]   STOCHASTIC ESTIMATION OF ORGANIZED TURBULENT STRUCTURE - HOMOGENEOUS SHEAR-FLOW [J].
ADRIAN, RJ ;
MOIN, P .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1988, 190 :531-559
[3]  
ADRIAN RJ, 1975, P 4 BIENN S TURB LIQ
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1987, TURBULENT SHEAR FLOW
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1987, P 6 S TURB SHEAR FLO
[6]  
ANTONIA RA, 1990, P INT C HEA, V28, P488
[7]   CONDITIONAL SAMPLING IN TURBULENCE MEASUREMENT [J].
ANTONIA, RA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1981, 13 :131-156
[8]   A DESCRIPTION OF THE ORGANIZED MOTION IN THE TURBULENT FAR WAKE OF A CYLINDER AT LOW REYNOLDS-NUMBER [J].
ANTONIA, RA ;
BROWNE, LWB ;
BISSET, DK ;
FULACHIER, L .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1987, 184 :423-444
[9]   THE DYNAMICS OF COHERENT STRUCTURES IN THE WALL REGION OF A TURBULENT BOUNDARY-LAYER [J].
AUBRY, N ;
HOLMES, P ;
LUMLEY, JL ;
STONE, E .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1988, 192 :115-173
[10]  
BACRY E, 1990, TURBULENCE COHERENT, P203