Integrated carbon analysis of forest management practices and wood substitution

被引:162
作者
Eriksson, Erik
Gillespie, Andrew R.
Gustavsson, Leif
Langvall, Ola
Olsson, Mats
Sathre, Roger
Stendahl, Johan
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Bioenergy, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Forestry & Nat Resources, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Mid Sweden Univ, SE-83125 Ostersund, Sweden
[4] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Unit Field Based Forest Res, Asa Forest Res Stn, SE-36030 Lammhult, Sweden
[5] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Forest Soils, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[6] Mid Sweden Univ, S-83125 Ostersund, Sweden
[7] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Forest Soils, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1139/X06-257
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
The complex fluxes between standing and harvested carbon stocks, and the linkage between harvested biomass and fossil fuel substitution, call for a holistic, system-wide analysis in a life-cycle perspective to evaluate the impacts of forest management and forest product use on carbon balances. We have analysed the net carbon emission under alternative forest management strategies and product uses, considering the carbon fluxes and stocks associated with tree biomass, soils, and forest products. Simulations were made using three Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) forest management regimes (traditional, intensive management, and intensive fertilization), three slash management practices (no removal, removal, and removal with stumps), two forest product uses (construction material and biofuel), and two reference fossil fuels (coal and natural as). The greatest reduction of net carbon emission occurred when the forest was fertilized. slash and stumps were harvested, wood was used as construction material, and the reference fossil fuel was coal. The lowest reduction occurred with a traditional forest management, forest residues retained on site, and harvested biomass was used as biofuel to replace natural gas. Product Use had the greatest impact on net carbon emission, whereas forest management regime, reference fossil fuel, and forest residue usage as biofluel were less significant.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 681
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Agren G., 1998, THEORETICAL ECOSYSTE
[2]   Changes in carbon stores in Swedish forest soils due to increased biomass harvest and increased temperatures analysed with a semi-empirical model [J].
Ågren, GI ;
Hyvönen, R .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 174 (1-3) :25-37
[3]   Combining theory and experiment to understand effects of inorganic nitrogen on litter decomposition [J].
Ågren, GI ;
Bosatta, E ;
Magill, AH .
OECOLOGIA, 2001, 128 (01) :94-98
[4]  
Ågren GI, 2007, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V82, P217, DOI [10.1007/s10533-006-9064-0, 10.1007/s10533-007-9151-x]
[5]  
[Anonymous], FOLIA FORESTALIA
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
[7]   Energy use and environmental impacts of forest operations in Sweden [J].
Berg, S ;
Lindholm, EL .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2005, 13 (01) :33-42
[8]   Potential production of Norway spruce in Sweden [J].
Bergh, J ;
Linder, S ;
Bergström, J .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 204 (01) :1-10
[9]   Greenhouse gas balances in building construction:: wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives [J].
Börjesson, P ;
Gustavsson, L .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (09) :575-588
[10]   Energy analysis of biomass production and transportation [J].
Borjesson, PII .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 1996, 11 (04) :305-318