Two year longitudinal change and test-retest-precision of knee cartilage morphology in a pilot study for the osteoarthritis initiative

被引:89
作者
Eckstein, F.
Kunz, M.
Schutzer, M.
Hudelmaier, M.
Jackson, R. D.
Yu, J.
Eaton, C. B.
Schneider, E.
机构
[1] Paracelsus Private Med Univ, Inst Anat & Muskoskeletal Res, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
[2] Chondrometr GmbH, Ainring, Germany
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Endocrinol Diabet & Metab, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Radiol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Mem Hosp Rhode Isl, Brown Med Sch, Ctr Primary Care & Prevent, Pawtucket, RI USA
[6] SciTrials, LLC, Rocky River, OH USA
[7] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Div Radiol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
cartilage; magnetic resonance imaging; osteoarthritis; biomarker;
D O I
10.1016/j.joca.2007.04.007
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Fast low angle shot (FLASH) and double echo steady state (DESS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisitions were recently cross-calibrated for quantification of cartilage morphology at 3 T. In this pilot study for the osteoarthritis (OA) initiative we compare their test-retest-precision and sensitivity to longitudinal change. Method: Nine participants with mild to moderate clinical OA were imaged twice each at baseline, year 1 (Y1) and year 2 (Y2). Coronal 1.5 mm FLASH and sagittal 0.7 mm DESS sequences were acquired; 1.5 mm coronal multiplanar reformats (MPR) were obtained from the DESS. Patellar, femoral and tibial cartilage plates were quantified in a paired fashion, with blinding to time point. Results: In the weight-bearing femorotibial joint, average precision errors across plates were 1.8% for FLASH, 2.6% for DESS, and 3.0% for MPR-DESS. Volume loss at Y1 was not significant; at Y2 the average change across the femorotibial cartilage plates was -1.7% for FLASH, -2.8% for DESS, and -0.3% for MPR-DESS. Volume change in the lateral tibia (-5.5%; P < 0.03), and in the medial (-2.9%; P < 0.04) and lateral femorotibial compartments (-3.8%; P < 0.03) were significant for DESS. Conclusions: FLASH, DESS and MPR-DESS all displayed adequate test-retest precision. Although the comparison between protocols is limited by the small number of participants and by the relatively small longitudinal change in cartilage morphology in this pilot study, the data suggest that significant change can be detected with MRI in a small sample of OA subjects over 2 years. @ 2007 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1326 / 1332
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   New MRI techniques for imaging cartilage [J].
Burstein, D ;
Gray, M .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A :70-77
[2]   Rate of cartilage loss at two years predicts subsequent total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study [J].
Cicuttini, FM ;
Jones, G ;
Forbes, A ;
Wluka, A .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2004, 63 (09) :1124-1127
[3]   Longitudinal study of changes in tibial and femoral cartilage in knee osteoarthritis [J].
Cicuttini, FM ;
Wuka, AE ;
Wang, Y ;
Stuckey, SL .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2004, 50 (01) :94-97
[4]   Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (OA): morphological assessment [J].
Eckstein, F. ;
Cicuttini, Flavia M. ;
Raynauld, J. -P. ;
Waterton, J. C. ;
Peterfy, C. .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2006, 14 :A46-A75
[5]   Proposal for a nomenclature for Magnetic Resonance Imaging based measures of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis [J].
Eckstein, F. ;
Ateshian, G. ;
Burgkart, R. ;
Burstein, D. ;
Cicuttini, F. ;
Dardzinski, B. ;
Gray, M. ;
Link, T. M. ;
Majumdar, S. ;
Mosher, T. ;
Peterfy, C. ;
Totterman, S. ;
Waterton, J. ;
Winalski, C. S. ;
Felson, D. .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2006, 14 (10) :974-983
[6]   Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 Tesla: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative [J].
Eckstein, F ;
Hudelmaier, M ;
Wirth, W ;
Kiefer, B ;
Jackson, R ;
Yu, J ;
Eaton, CB ;
Schneider, E .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2006, 65 (04) :433-441
[7]   Accuracy and precision of quantitative assessment of cartilage morphology by magnetic resonance Imaging at 3.0T [J].
Eckstein, F ;
Charles, HC ;
Buck, RJ ;
Kraus, VB ;
Remmers, AE ;
Hudelmaier, M ;
Wirth, W ;
Evelhoch, JL .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2005, 52 (10) :3132-3136
[8]   Long-term and resegmentation precision of quantitative cartilage MR imaging (qMRI) [J].
Eckstein, F ;
Heudorfer, L ;
Faber, SC ;
Burgkart, R ;
Englmeier, KH ;
Reiser, M .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2002, 10 (12) :922-928
[9]   Quantitative MRI of cartilage and bone: degenerative changes in osteoarthritis [J].
Eckstein, Felix ;
Burstein, Deborah ;
Link, Thomas M. .
NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2006, 19 (07) :822-854
[10]   Femoro-tibial cartilage metrics from coronal MR image data: Technique, test-retest reproducibility, and findings in osteoarthritis [J].
Glaser, C ;
Burgkart, R ;
Kutschera, A ;
Englmeier, KH ;
Reiser, M ;
Eckstein, F .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2003, 50 (06) :1229-1236