Computational model of forward and opposed smoldering combustion in microgravity

被引:51
作者
Rein, Guillermo [1 ]
Fernandez-Pello, A. Carlos [1 ]
Urban, David L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] NASA Glenn Res Ctr, Cleveland, OH USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
smoulder; polyurethane; fire; kinetics; porous media;
D O I
10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.047
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
A novel computational model of smoldering combustion capable of predicting both forward and opposed propagation is developed. This is accomplished by considering the one-dimensional, transient, governing equations for smoldering combustion in a porous fuel accounting for improved chemical kinetics. The heterogeneous chemistry is modeled with a 5-step mechanism for polyurethane foam. The kinetic parameters for this mechanism were obtained from thermogravimetric data in the literature and reported by the authors elsewhere. The results from previously conducted microgravity experiments with flexible polyurethane foam are used for calibration and testing of the numerical results. Both forward and opposed smoldering configurations are examined. By considering the 5-step mechanism, the numerical model is able to predict qualitatively and quantitatively the smoldering behavior, reproducing the most important features of the process. Specifically, the model predicts the transient temperature profiles, the overall structure of the reaction-front, the onset of smoldering ignition, and the propagation rate. The fact that it is possible to predict the experimental observations in both opposed and forward propagation with a single model is a significant improvement in the development of numerical models of smoldering combustion. This is particularly relevant in multidimensional simulations where distinction between forward and opposed modes is no longer applicable. (c) 2006 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2677 / 2684
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   The effect of buoyancy on opposed smoldering [J].
Bar-Ilan, A ;
Rein, G ;
Walther, DC ;
Fernandez-Pello, AC ;
Torero, JL ;
Urban, DL .
COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 176 (12) :2027-2055
[2]   Forced forward smoldering experiments in microgravity [J].
Bar-Ilan, A ;
Rein, G ;
Fernandez-Pello, AC ;
Torero, JL ;
Urban, DL .
EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE, 2004, 28 (07) :743-751
[3]  
BROWN PN, 1989, J SCI STAT COMPUT, V10, P1038
[4]   An elementary discussion of forward smoldering [J].
Buckmaster, J ;
Lozinski, D .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1996, 104 (03) :300-310
[5]   Mechanisms of two-dimensional smoldering propagation through packed fuel beds [J].
DiBlasi, C .
COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 106 (1-3) :103-124
[6]   FORCED COCURRENT SMOLDERING COMBUSTION [J].
DOSANJH, SS ;
PAGNI, PJ ;
FERNANDEZPELLO, AC .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1987, 68 (02) :131-142
[7]   Modeling extinction in forced opposed-flow smolder [J].
Kelley, ML ;
Schult, DA .
COMBUSTION THEORY AND MODELLING, 2006, 10 (01) :133-143
[8]   Kinetic and fuel property effects on forward smoldering combustion [J].
Leach, SV ;
Rein, G ;
Ellzey, JL ;
Ezekoye, OA ;
Torero, JL .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2000, 120 (03) :346-358
[9]   QUENCHING OF REVERSE SMOLDER [J].
LOZINSKI, D ;
BUCKMASTER, J .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1995, 102 (1-2) :87-100
[10]   AN EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF FORWARD AND REVERSE SMOLDER PROPAGATION IN PERMEABLE FUEL BEDS [J].
OHLEMILLER, TJ ;
LUCCA, DA .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1983, 54 (1-3) :131-147