Odorant-specific patterns of sniffing during imagery distinguish 'bad' and 'good' olfactory imagers

被引:49
作者
Bensafi, M
Pouliot, S
Sobel, N
机构
[1] Univ Lyon 1, Lab Neurosci & Syst Sensoriels, CNRS, UMR 5020, F-69366 Lyon, France
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Helen Wills Neurosci Inst, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Psychol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Psychol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
hedonics; individual differences; mental imagery; olfaction; sniffing;
D O I
10.1093/chemse/bji045
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
There are large individual differences in the self-reported ability to form vivid olfactory mental imagery. Based on such self-reports, subjects have been classified as 'bad' or 'good' imagers. The present study examined whether a differential strategy in re-enacting the olfactomotor response during imagery may explain the dissociation between 'bad' and 'good' olfactory imagers. As previously reported, odor imagery was accompanied by sniffing. Although 'bad' and 'good' olfactory imagers did not differ in their overall sniffing volume, they used different strategies when re-enacting the motor component of olfaction during imagery. Particularly, as in real perception, 'good' but not 'bad' imagers generated bigger sniffs when imagining a pleasant smell compared with an unpleasant smell (P < 0.02). Furthermore, preventing sniffing significantly hampered mental imagery of pleasant odors in 'good' but not 'bad' imagers (P < 0.03). Taken together, these results suggest (i) the validity of the dissociation between 'bad' and 'good' olfactory imagers as revealed by self-report; (ii) that sniffing may be a causal factor in the creation of olfactory imagery; and (iii) that sniff measurements may serve as a reliable non-verbal tool in exploring individual differences in odor imagery.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 529
页数:9
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Olfactory reactions in the brain of the hedgehog [J].
Adrian, ED .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1942, 100 (04) :459-473
[2]  
AHSEN A, 1986, J MENTAL IMAGERY, V10, P1
[3]   REMEMBERED ODORS AND MENTAL MIXTURES - TAPPING RESERVOIRS OF OLFACTORY KNOWLEDGE [J].
ALGOM, D ;
CAIN, WS .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1991, 17 (04) :1104-1119
[4]   MEMORY PSYCHOPHYSICS FOR CHEMOSENSATION - PERCEPTUAL AND MENTAL MIXTURES OF ODOR AND TASTE [J].
ALGOM, D ;
MARKS, LE ;
CAIN, WS .
CHEMICAL SENSES, 1993, 18 (02) :151-160
[5]   Olfactomotor activity during imagery mimics that during perception [J].
Bensafi, M ;
Porter, J ;
Pouliot, S ;
Mainland, J ;
Johnson, B ;
Zelano, C ;
Young, N ;
Bremner, E ;
Aframian, D ;
Khan, R ;
Sobel, N .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 6 (11) :1142-1144
[6]   FREQUENCY-ANALYSIS OF OLFACTORY SYSTEM EEG IN CAT, RABBIT, AND RAT [J].
BRESSLER, SL ;
FREEMAN, WJ .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1980, 50 (1-2) :19-24
[7]   Perceptual and mental mixtures in odor and in taste: Are there similarities and differences between experiments or between modalities? Reply [J].
Cain, WS ;
Algom, D .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1997, 23 (05) :1588-1593
[8]   OLFACTORY PERCEPTION AND OLFACTORY IMAGERY - A MULTIDIMENSIONAL-ANALYSIS [J].
CARRASCO, M ;
RIDOUT, JB .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1993, 19 (02) :287-301
[9]   A QUESTIONABLE QUESTIONNAIRE - A REJOINDER [J].
CHARA, PJ .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1989, 68 (01) :159-162
[10]  
Crowder R. G., 1995, MEMORY ODORS, P93