Green defaults: Information presentation and pro-environmental behaviour

被引:268
作者
Pichert, Daniel [1 ]
Katsikopoulos, Konstantinos V. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
decision research; policy making; pro-environmental behaviour; defaults; energy;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
There is inconsistency in many people's choice of electricity. When asked, they say they prefer a 'green' (i.e., environmentally friendly) source for this energy. Yet, although green electricity is available in many markets, people do not generally buy it. Why not? Motivated by behavioural decision research, we argue that the format of information presentation drastically affects the choice of electricity. Specifically, we hypothesise that people use the kind of electricity that is offered to them as the default. We present two natural studies and two experiments in the laboratory that support this hypothesis. In the two real-world situations, there was a green default, and most people used it. In the first laboratory experiment, more participants chose the green utility when it was the default than when 'grey' electricity was the default. In the second laboratory experiment, participants asked for more money to give up green electricity than they were willing to pay for it. We argue that changing defaults can be used to promote pro-environmental behaviour. Potential policy-making applications of this work are discussed. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 73
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion [J].
Anderson, CJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2003, 129 (01) :139-167
[2]  
[Anonymous], NRELTP55026148
[3]   How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question [J].
Bamberg, S .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 23 (01) :21-32
[4]   Psychology implies paternalism? Bounded rationality may reduce the rationale to regulate risk-taking [J].
Berg, Nathan ;
Gigerenzer, Gerd .
SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2007, 28 (02) :337-359
[5]   Constructive consumer choice processes [J].
Bettman, JR ;
Luce, MF ;
Payne, JW .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1998, 25 (03) :187-217
[6]   A review of international green power markets:: recent experience, trends, and market drivers [J].
Bird, L ;
Wüstenhagen, R ;
Aabakken, J .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2002, 6 (06) :513-536
[7]  
Brewer G., 2005, DECISION MAKING ENV
[8]   The skeptical shopper: A metacognitive account for the effects of default options on choice [J].
Brown, CL ;
Krishna, A .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2004, 31 (03) :529-539
[9]  
Camerer C.F., 2000, CHOICES VALUES FRAME, P288
[10]  
Choi J.J., 2002, Tax Policy and the Economy, V16, P67