The determinants of relational governance and performance: How to manage business relationships?

被引:198
作者
Claro, DP [1 ]
Hagelaar, G [1 ]
Omta, O [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Sch Social Sci, Dept Business Adm Bode 77, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
business relationships; relational governance; relationship management;
D O I
10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.06.010
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
It is the aim of this study to assess the influence of the determinants of the transaction, dyadic, and business environment level on relational governance and ultimately performance. We build an integrated framework for relationship management drawing from literature of transaction cost economics, marketing channels, and business networks. Dutch suppliers of potted plant and flower products (N = 174) provided data for the empirical analysis. Our results show that joint planning, one of the constructs of relational governance, is positively influenced by interorganizational trust, information obtained from the network, physical transaction-specific investments (TSIs), and by fixed lines as the exchange mode. Joint problem solving, the other construct of the governance, is solely influenced by the two dimensions of trust. These two constructs of relational governance effect positively our performance measures. Managers should consider carefully each of the determinants of relational governance for the management of a relationship. As shown in our study, the success is dependent on some of the determinants of the three analytical levels of our integrated framework. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 716
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   DETERMINANTS OF CONTINUITY IN CONVENTIONAL INDUSTRIAL CHANNEL DYADS [J].
ANDERSON, E ;
WEITZ, B .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1989, 8 (04) :310-323
[2]   DYADIC BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN A BUSINESS NETWORK CONTEXT [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
HAKANSSON, H ;
JOHANSON, J .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1994, 58 (04) :1-15
[3]   A MODEL OF DISTRIBUTOR FIRM AND MANUFACTURER FIRM WORKING PARTNERSHIPS [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
NARUS, JA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1990, 54 (01) :42-58
[4]  
[Anonymous], DEV RELATIONSHIPS BU
[5]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[6]   TRUSTWORTHINESS AS A SOURCE OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, JB ;
HANSEN, MH .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1994, 15 :175-190
[7]   CONFIGURATIONS OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS - A COMPARISON BETWEEN US AND JAPANESE AUTOMAKERS [J].
BENSAOU, M ;
VENKATRAMAN, N .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1995, 41 (09) :1471-1492
[8]   A formal model of trust based on outcomes [J].
Bhattacharya, R ;
Devinney, TM ;
Pillutla, MM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (03) :459-472
[9]   PRICE, AUTHORITY, AND TRUST - FROM IDEAL TYPES TO PLURAL FORMS [J].
BRADACH, JL ;
ECCLES, RG .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1989, 15 :97-118
[10]   MODELS OF NETWORK STRUCTURE [J].
BURT, RS .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1980, 6 :79-141