Biomechanical comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion performed at 1 and 2 levels

被引:121
作者
Ames, CP
Acosta, FL
Chi, J
Iyengar, J
Muiru, W
Acaroglu, E
Puttlitz, CM
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurol Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Biomed Engn, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
lumbar spine; interbody fusion; stability; pedicle screws;
D O I
10.1097/01.brs.0000180505.80347.b1
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Biomechanical laboratory study of human cadaveric spines. Objective. To determine the difference in acute stability between posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) performed at 1 and 2 levels with and without posterior fixation. Summary of Background Data. Circumferential spinal fusion with both an interbody graft and posterior pedicle screw-rod construct has been advocated to decrease pseudarthrosis rates. Both PLIF and TLIF theoretically allow for 3-column fixation and fusion. Methods. Specimens underwent either PLIF or TLIF at L2-L3 (single-level) and L3-L4 (2-level), both with and without pedicle screw instrumentation. During TLIF, an interbody allograft was placed in the anterior or middle column. Nondestructive, nonconstraining pure moment loading was applied to each specimen. Results. There were no significant differences in the range of motion after either PLIF or TLIF at 1 level. The addition of pedicle screws tended more strongly to increase rigidity after 1-level PLIF compared to TLIF. Position of the TLIF graft did not affect stability. The addition of pedicle screws to a 2-level construct significantly reduced all motions tested. Conclusions. Based on our findings, posterior fixation with a pedicle screw-rod construct is suggested for 1-level PLIF and TLIF, and is necessary to achieve stability after interbody fusion across 2 levels using either technique.
引用
收藏
页码:E562 / E566
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
BLUME HG, 1985, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P75
[2]   Anterior lumbar interbody fusion for the management of chronic lower back pain: current strategies and concepts [J].
Burkus, JK ;
Schuler, TC ;
Gornet, MF ;
Zdeblick, TA .
ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2004, 35 (01) :25-+
[3]  
ENKER P, 1994, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P90
[4]  
FRASER RD, 1995, SPINE S, V20, P167
[5]   Pseudarthrosis of the lumbar spine - Outcome after circumferential fusion [J].
Gertzbein, SD ;
Hollopeter, MR ;
Hall, S .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (21) :2352-2356
[6]   A ONE-STAGER PROCEDURE IN OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF SPONDYLOLISTHESES - DORSAL TRACTION-REPOSITION AND ANTERIOR FUSION [J].
HARMS, J ;
ROLINGER, H .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE, 1982, 120 (03) :343-347
[7]   Comparison of the mini-open versus laparoscopic approach for anterior lumbar Interbody fusion: A retrospective review [J].
Kaiser, MG ;
Haid, RW ;
Subach, BR ;
Miller, JS ;
Smith, CD ;
Rodts, GE .
NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 51 (01) :97-103
[8]   Radiographic analysis of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis [J].
Kwon, BK ;
Berta, S ;
Daffner, SD ;
Vaccaro, AR ;
Hilibrand, AS ;
Grauer, JN ;
Beiner, J ;
Albert, TJ .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2003, 16 (05) :469-476
[9]   Biomechanical testing of posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques [J].
Melcher, RP ;
Puttlitz, CM ;
Kleinstueck, FS ;
Lotz, JC ;
Harms, J ;
Bradford, DS .
SPINE, 2002, 27 (22) :2435-2440
[10]   Lumbar interbody fusion: state-of-the-art technical advances - Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004 [J].
Mummaneni, PV ;
Haid, RW ;
Rodts, GE .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2004, 1 (01) :24-30