Double-blind, crossover comparison of 3 mg apomorphine SL with placebo and with 4 mg apomorphine SL in male erectile dysfunction

被引:98
作者
Dula, E
Bukofzer, S
Perdok, R
George, M
机构
[1] W Coastal Clin Res, Van Nuys, CA 91405 USA
[2] Abbott Labs, Abbott Pk, IL 60064 USA
[3] Takeda Europe R&D Ctr, London, England
关键词
apomorphine SL; crossover study; dopamine agonist; erectile dysfunction; risk-benefit ratio;
D O I
10.1159/000052503
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To establish the efficacy and safety of a fixed, 3-mg dose of apomorphine SL compared with placebo, and to compare 3 mg with 4 mg apomorphine SL in patients with erectile dysfunction. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, crossover study included 296 heterosexual men with ED of various etiologies and severities. Two crossover groups were evaluated separately: 3 mg apomorphine SL vs. placebo (n = 194), and 3 vs. 4 mg apomorphine SL (n = 102). The primary efficacy variable was the percentage of attempts resulting in erections firm enough for intercourse; additional variables included the percentage of attempts resulting in intercourse and time to erection. Partner assessments were also analyzed. Results: 3 mg apomorphine SL was significantly more effective than placebo (p <0.001) for the percentage of attempts resulting in erections firm enough for intercourse and resulting in intercourse, as assessed by both patients and partners. Median time to erection was 18.8 min. The 3-mg dose was not significantly different from 4 mg in the evaluation of efficacy variables, but the incidence of adverse events was higher with 4 mg. Nausea was the most common event, reported by 3.3% of patients on 3 mg vs. 14.1% on 4 mg; in the placebo comparison, nausea was reported by 7.0% of patients taking 3 mg apomorphine SL vs. 1.1% of those taking placebo. Conclusions: 3 mg apomorphine SL was significantly more effective than placebo and comparable to 4 mg, while offering an improved risk-benefit ratio. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / 563
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1999, 1 INT CONS ER DYSF
  • [2] Cilurzo P, 1992, Arch Ital Urol Nefrol Androl, V64 Suppl 2, P81
  • [3] DROLLER MJ, 1993, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V270, P83
  • [4] Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose and dose-optimization regimens of sublingual apomorphine versus placebo in men with erectile dysfunction
    Dula, E
    Keating, W
    Siami, PF
    Edmonds, A
    O'Neil, J
    Buttler, S
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2000, 56 (01) : 130 - 135
  • [5] IMPOTENCE AND ITS MEDICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL CORRELATES - RESULTS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS MALE AGING STUDY
    FELDMAN, HA
    GOLDSTEIN, I
    HATZICHRISTOU, DG
    KRANE, RJ
    MCKINLAY, JB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (01) : 54 - 61
  • [6] FISHER C, 1975, J SEX MARITAL THER, V1, P277
  • [7] Nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity monitoring in young potent volunteers: Reproducibility, evaluation criteria and the effect of sexual intercourse
    Hatzichristou, DG
    Hatzimouratidis, K
    Ioannides, E
    Yannakoyorgos, K
    Dimitriadis, G
    Kalinderis, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (06) : 1921 - 1926
  • [8] RECOVERY OF ERECTILE FUNCTION BY THE ORAL-ADMINISTRATION OF APOMORPHINE
    HEATON, JPW
    MORALES, A
    ADAMS, MA
    JOHNSTON, B
    ELRASHIDY, R
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1995, 45 (02) : 200 - 206
  • [9] Apomorphine: an update of clinical trial results
    Heaton, JPW
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 2000, 12 (Suppl 4) : S67 - S73
  • [10] LEVINE LA, 1995, UROL CLIN N AM, V22, P775