Nationwide trends in laparoscopic colectomy from 2000 to 2004

被引:87
作者
Kemp, Jason A. [1 ]
Finlayson, Samuel R. G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[2] VA Med Ctr, Vet Affairs Outcomes Grp, White River Jct, VT USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2008年 / 22卷 / 05期
关键词
colectomy; colon resection; laparoscopic colectomy; laparoscopy; trends;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-007-9732-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Over the past 5 years, several studies have demonstrated that laparoscopic colon resection is an acceptable and perhaps preferable alternative to open resection for both benign diseases and cancer. The extent to which laparoscopic colon resections are used nationally is not known. Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify laparoscopic and open elective colon resections performed in the United States each year from 2000 through 2004. The trends in adoption of the laparoscopic technique for each type of colon resection and for the most common diagnoses were identified, and differences in patient and provider characteristics were examined. Results From 2000 to 2004, the proportion of colon resections performed laparoscopically increased from 3% to 6.5%. The proportion performed for cancer increased from 1.4% to 4.3%, and for benign disease from 4.6% to 8.2%. Patients treated laparoscopically tended to be younger ( median age, 61 years vs 66 years; p < 0.001) and to have fewer comorbidities (Charlson score of zero for 58.1% vs 37%; p < 0.001). Laparoscopic colon resections were more widely adopted in teaching versus nonteaching hospitals (5.1% vs 3.7%; p < 0.001) and in urban versus rural hospitals (4.7% vs 2.2%; p < 0.001). Conclusion Although the proportion of colon resections performed laparoscopically increased in the first half of this decade, it has remained very low. This trend is similar across procedure types and diagnoses. It remains to be seen whether greater patient demand and more recent trials will result in wider adoption of the laparoscopic approach.
引用
收藏
页码:1181 / 1187
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   LAPAROSCOPICALLY ASSISTED COLECTOMY AND WOUND RECURRENCE [J].
ALEXANDER, RJT ;
JAQUES, BC ;
MITCHELL, KG .
LANCET, 1993, 341 (8839) :249-250
[2]  
[Anonymous], NATIONWIDE INPATIENT
[3]   Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer:: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial [J].
Bonjer, HJ ;
Haglind, E ;
Jeekel, I ;
Kazemier, G ;
Páhlman, L ;
Hop, WCJ ;
Veldkamp, R ;
Kuhry, E ;
Haglind, E ;
Pahlman, L ;
Cuesta, MA ;
Msika, S ;
Morino, M ;
Lacy, A ;
Jeekel, I .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (07) :477-484
[4]   Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery - A randomized trial on short-term outcome [J].
Braga, M ;
Vignali, A ;
Gianotti, L ;
Zuliani, W ;
Radaelli, G ;
Gruarin, P ;
Dellabona, P ;
Di Carlo, V .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 236 (06) :759-766
[5]   Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection -: Eight-year results [J].
Dinçler, S ;
Koller, MT ;
Steurer, J ;
Bachmann, LM ;
Christen, D ;
Buchmann, P .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2003, 46 (10) :1371-1378
[6]   National trends in utilization and outcomes of antireflux surgery [J].
Finlayson, SRG ;
Laycock, WS ;
Birkmeyer, JD .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2003, 17 (06) :864-867
[7]   Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial [J].
Guillou, PJ ;
Quirke, P ;
Thorpe, H ;
Walker, J ;
Jayne, DG ;
Smith, AMH ;
Heath, RM ;
Brown, JM .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9472) :1718-1726
[8]   Laparoscopic vs open colectomy - Outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases [J].
Guller, U ;
Pain, N ;
Hervey, S ;
Purves, H ;
Pietrobon, R .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2003, 138 (11) :1179-1186
[9]  
Jacobs M, 1991, Surg Laparosc Endosc, V1, P144
[10]   Trends in adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in rural versus urban hospitals [J].
Kemp, Jason A. ;
Zuckerman, Randall S. ;
Finlayson, Samuel R. G. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2008, 206 (01) :28-32