Urological complications in kidney transplantation: Ureterocystostomy versus uretero-ureterostomy

被引:34
作者
Faenza, A
Nardo, B
Fuga, G
Liviano-D'Arcangelo, G
Grammatico, F
Montalti, R
Bertelli, R
Beltempo, P
Puviani, L
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Surg, Instens Care Unit & Transplantat, Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Bologna, Dept Nephrol, Bologna, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.06.079
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
In our initial experience of kidney transplantation, we performed an extravesical ureterocystostomy (U-C), but in 1997 we shifted to a uretero-ureterostomy (U-U) with the aim of reducing early and late urological complications. A data base was constructed to compare the incidence, donor and recipient risk factors, treatments, and outcomes of urological complications with the two techniques. From 1990 to the end of July 2004, 894 kidney transplants included 43 from living donors and 851 from cadaveric donors with 804 first and 47 second transplants. We observed 48 urinary fistulas (5.4%): 45 were successfully repaired and three were treated with a ureteral stent with two good results; and one failed at a late operation. We had 26 early stenoses (2.9%), all of which were successfully treated: 16 with surgery and 10 with a stent. Donor and recipient risk factors for fistula and early stenosis did not reach statistical significance, confirming the technical etiology of these complications. There were only six cases of late ureteral stenosis in patients operated after 1990, and in eight cases of U-C we observed vesico ureteral reflux. There were 88 urological complications, with only one kidney lost. The shift from U-C to U-U did not change the incidence of urological complications, but with U-U we observed a significant decrease in the number of postoperative urinary infections, an easier possibility to resolve ureteral stenosis with endourology and no reflux. It is now our first choice with a normal ureter.
引用
收藏
页码:2518 / 2520
页数:3
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Insertion of a double pigtail ureteral stent for the prevention of urological complications in renal transplantation: A prospective randomized study [J].
Benoit, G ;
Blanchet, P ;
Eschwege, P ;
Alexandre, L ;
Bensadoun, H ;
Charpentier, B .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (03) :881-884
[2]   Ureteric stenosis after renal transplantation: No effect of acute rejection or immunosuppression [J].
Brook, NR ;
Waller, JR ;
Pattenden, CJ ;
Nicholson, ML .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 34 (07) :3007-3008
[3]   Ureterovesical anastomosis in renal transplants: Fewer complications with the extravesical technique [J].
Butterworth, PC ;
Horsburgh, T ;
Veitch, PS ;
Bell, PRF ;
Nicholson, ML .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1997, 29 (1-2) :151-151
[4]   Is routine ureteric stenting needed in kidney transplantation? A randomized trial [J].
Dominguez, J ;
Clase, CM ;
Mahalati, K ;
MacDonald, AS ;
McAlister, VC ;
Belitsky, P ;
Kiberd, B ;
Lawen, JG .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 70 (04) :597-601
[5]   Urologic complications in 1275 consecutive renal transplantations [J].
Emiroglu, R ;
Karakayall, H ;
Sevmis, S ;
Akkoç, H ;
Bilgin, N ;
Haberal, M .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (1-2) :2016-2017
[6]   Ureteral stenosis after kidney transplantation - A study on 869 consecutive transplants [J].
Faenza, A ;
Nardo, B ;
Catena, F ;
Scolari, MP ;
d'Arcangelo, GL ;
Buscaroli, A ;
Rossi, C ;
Zompatori, M .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 12 (05) :334-340
[7]  
HAKIM NS, 1994, CLIN TRANSPLANT, V8, P504
[8]   Urological complications after 2084 consecutive kidney transplantations [J].
Makisalo, H ;
Eklund, B ;
Salmela, K ;
Isoniemi, H ;
Kyllonen, L ;
Hockerstedt, K ;
Halme, L ;
Ahonen, J .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1997, 29 (1-2) :152-153
[9]   Stented versus nonstented extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplantation: A metaanalysis [J].
Mangus, RS ;
Haag, BW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (11) :1889-1896
[10]   Urological complications of renal transplantation: A series of 900 cases [J].
Reek, C ;
Noster, M ;
Burmeister, D ;
Wolff, JM ;
Seiter, H .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 35 (06) :2106-2107