Biomarker-calibrated dietary energy and protein intake associations with diabetes risk among postmenopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative

被引:96
作者
Tinker, Lesley F. [1 ]
Sarto, Gloria E. [2 ]
Howard, Barbara V. [3 ,4 ]
Huang, Ying
Neuhouser, Marian L.
Mossavar-Rahmani, Yasmin [5 ]
Beasley, Jeannette M.
Margolis, Karen L. [6 ]
Eaton, Charles B. [7 ]
Phillips, Lawrence S. [8 ]
Prentice, Ross L.
机构
[1] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Div Publ Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA
[3] Georgetown Univ, Washington, DC USA
[4] Medstar Res Inst, Washington, DC USA
[5] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[6] Hlth Partners Res Fdn, Minneapolis, MN USA
[7] Brown Univ, Mem Hosp Rhode Isl, Pawtucket, RI 02860 USA
[8] Emory Univ, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
BASE-LINE CHARACTERISTICS; SELF-REPORTS; FAT; PATTERN; CANCER; CONSUMPTION; WEIGHT;
D O I
10.3945/ajcn.111.018648
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background: Self-report of dietary energy and protein intakes has been shown to be systematically and differentially underreported. Objective: We assessed and compared the association of diabetes among postmenopausal women with biomarker-calibrated and uncalibrated dietary energy and protein intakes from food-frequency questionnaires (FFQs). Design: The analyses were performed for 74,155 participants of various race-ethnicities from the Women's Health Initiative. Uncalibrated and calibrated energy and protein intakes from FFQs were assessed for associations with incident diabetes by using HR estimates based on Cox regression. Results: A 20% increment in uncalibrated energy consumption was associated with increased diabetes risk (HR) of 1.03 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.05), 2.41 (95% CI: 2.06, 2.82) with biomarker calibration, and 1.30 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.76) after adjustment for BMI. A 20% increment in uncalibrated protein (g/d) resulted in an HR of 1.05 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.07), 1.82 (95% CI: 1.56, 2.12) with calibration, and 1.16 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.28) with adjustment for BMI. A 20% increment in uncalibrated protein density (% of energy from protein) resulted in an HR of 1.13 (95% CI: 1.09, 1.17), 1.01 (95% CI: 0.75, 1.37) with calibration, and 1.19 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.32) with adjustment for BMI. Conclusions: Higher protein and total energy intakes (calibrated) appear to be associated with a substantially increased diabetes risk that may be mediated by an increase in body mass over time. Diet-disease associations without correction of self-reported measurement error should be viewed with caution. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00000611. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;94: 1600-6.
引用
收藏
页码:1600 / 1606
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Adapting the Diabetes Prevention Program lifestyle intervention for delivery in the community - The YMCA model [J].
Ackermann, Ronald T. ;
Marrero, David G. .
DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2007, 33 (01) :69-+
[2]  
Amer Diabet Assoc, 2011, DIABETES CARE, V34, pS11, DOI [10.2337/dc10-S062, 10.2337/dc14-S081, 10.2337/dc11-S011, 10.2337/dc13-S011, 10.2337/dc13-S067, 10.2337/dc12-s064, 10.2337/dc11-S062, 10.2337/dc10-S011, 10.2337/dc12-s011]
[3]  
Anderson G, 1998, CONTROL CLIN TRIALS, V19, P61
[4]   Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of colorectal cancer - The Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled dietary modification trial [J].
Beresford, SAA ;
Johnson, KC ;
Ritenbaugh, C ;
Lasser, NL ;
Snetselaar, LG ;
Black, HR ;
Anderson, GL ;
Assaf, AR ;
Bassford, T ;
Bowen, D ;
Brunner, RL ;
Brzyski, RG ;
Caan, B ;
Chlebowski, RT ;
Gass, M ;
Harrigan, RC ;
Hays, J ;
Heber, D ;
Heiss, G ;
Hendrix, SL ;
Howard, BV ;
Hsia, J ;
Hubbell, FA ;
Jackson, RD ;
Kotchen, JM ;
Kuller, LH ;
LaCroix, AZ ;
Lane, DS ;
Langer, RD ;
Lewis, CE ;
Manson, JE ;
Margolis, KL ;
Mossavar-Rahmani, Y ;
Ockene, JK ;
Parker, LM ;
Perri, MG ;
Phillips, L ;
Prentice, RL ;
Robbins, J ;
Rossouw, JE ;
Sarto, GE ;
Stefanick, ML ;
Van Horn, L ;
Vitolins, MZ ;
Wactawski-Wende, J ;
Wallace, RB ;
Whitlock, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (06) :643-654
[5]   Relative role of major risk factors for Type 2 diabetes development in the historical cohort of the Brisighella Heart Study: an 8-year follow-up [J].
Cicero, AFG ;
Dormi, A ;
Nascetti, S ;
Panourgia, MP ;
Grandi, E ;
D'Addato, S ;
Gaddi, A .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2005, 22 (09) :1263-1266
[6]   DIET AND RISK OF CLINICAL DIABETES IN WOMEN [J].
COLDITZ, GA ;
MANSON, JE ;
STAMPFER, MJ ;
ROSNER, B ;
WILLETT, WC ;
SPEIZER, FE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1992, 55 (05) :1018-1023
[7]   WEIGHT AS A RISK FACTOR FOR CLINICAL DIABETES IN WOMEN [J].
COLDITZ, GA ;
WILLETT, WC ;
STAMPFER, MJ ;
MANSON, JE ;
HENNEKENS, CH ;
ARKY, RA ;
SPEIZER, FE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 132 (03) :501-513
[8]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[9]   Urinary Biomarkers of Meat Consumption [J].
Cross, Amanda J. ;
Major, Jacqueline M. ;
Sinha, Rashmi .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2011, 20 (06) :1107-1111
[10]   THE PROBLEM OF PROFOUND MISMEASUREMENT AND THE POWER OF EPIDEMIOLOGICAL-STUDIES OF DIET AND CANCER [J].
FREUDENHEIM, JL ;
MARSHALL, JR .
NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 1988, 11 (04) :243-250