Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: III. Family history, actinic damage and phenotypic factors

被引:518
作者
Gandini, S
Sera, F
Cattaruzza, MS
Pasquini, P
Zanetti, R
Masini, C
Boyle, P
Melchi, CF
机构
[1] IRCCS, European Inst Oncol, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[2] CSPO, Sci Inst Tuscany, Mol & Nutr Epidemiol Unit, I-50135 Florence, Italy
[3] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[4] IRCCS, Lab Clin Epidemiol, Ist Dermopatico Immaticolata, I-00167 Rome, Italy
[5] CPO, Piedmont Canc Reg, Turin, Italy
[6] IRCCS, IDI, I-00167 Rome, Italy
[7] Int Agcy Res Canc, F-69372 Lyon, France
关键词
melanoma; meta-analysis; epidemiology; review literature; phenotype; family history; actinic damage;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2005.03.034
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
A systematic meta-analysis of observational studies of melanoma and family history, actinic damage and phenotypic factors was conducted as part of a comprehensive meta-analysis of all major risk factors for melanoma. Following a systematic literature search, relative risks were extracted from 60 studies published before September 2002. Fixed and random effects models were used to obtain pooled estimates for family history (RR = 1.74, 1.41-2.14), skin type (I vs. IV: RR = 2.09, 1.67-2.58), high density of freckles (RR = 2.10, 1.80-2.45), skin colour (Fair vs. Dark: RR = 2.06, 1.68-2.52), eye colour (Blue vs. Dark: RR = 1.47, 1.28-1.69) and hair colour (Red vs. Dark: RR = 3.64, 2.56-5.37), pre-malignant and skin cancer lesions (RR = 4.28, 2.80-6.55) and actinic damage indicators (RR = 2.02, 1.24-3.29). Sub-group analysis and meta-regression were carried out to explore sources of between-study variation and bias. Sensitivity analyses investigated reliability of results and publication bias. Latitude and adjustment for phenotype were two study characteristics that significantly influenced the estimates. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2040 / 2059
页数:20
相关论文
共 119 条
[1]  
AMMANNATTI P, 1987, G ITAL DERMATOL VENE
[2]  
Armstrong BK, 2004, CANC PREV CANC CAUSE, V3, P89
[3]  
AUGUSTSSON A, 1991, ACTA DERM-VENEREOL, V71, P518
[4]   CUTANEOUS MALIGNANT-MELANOMA AND EXPOSURE TO SUNLAMPS OR SUNBEDS - AN EORTC MULTICENTER CASE-CONTROL STUDY IN BELGIUM, FRANCE AND GERMANY [J].
AUTIER, P ;
DORE, JF ;
LEJEUNE, F ;
KOELMEL, KF ;
GEFFELER, O ;
HILLE, P ;
CESARINI, JP ;
LIENARD, D ;
LIABEUF, A ;
JOARLETTE, M ;
CHEMALY, P ;
HAKIM, K ;
KOELN, A ;
KLEEBERG, UR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 58 (06) :809-813
[5]   SELF-REPORTS OF MOLE COUNTS AND CUTANEOUS MALIGNANT-MELANOMA IN WOMEN - METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES AND RISK OF DISEASE [J].
BAIN, C ;
COLDITZ, GA ;
WILLETT, WC ;
STAMPFER, MJ ;
GREEN, A ;
BRONSTEIN, BR ;
MIHM, MC ;
ROSNER, B ;
HENNEKENS, CH ;
SPEIZER, FE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1988, 127 (04) :703-712
[6]   Sunburn, sunscreens, and phenotypes: some risk factors for cutaneous melanoma in southern Brazil [J].
Bakos, L ;
Wagner, M ;
Bakos, RM ;
Leite, CSM ;
Sperhacke, CL ;
Dzekaniak, KS ;
Gleisner, ALM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2002, 41 (09) :557-562
[7]   Risk of cutaneous melanoma in relation to the numbers, types and sites of naevi: A case-control study [J].
Bataille, V ;
Bishop, JAN ;
Sasieni, P ;
Swerdlow, AJ ;
Pinney, E ;
Griffiths, K ;
Cuzickz, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 73 (12) :1605-1611
[8]   Familial aggregation of melanoma risks in a large population-based sample of melanoma cases [J].
Begg C.B. ;
Hummer A. ;
Mujumdar U. ;
Armstrong B.K. ;
Kricker A. ;
Marrett L.D. ;
Millikan R.C. ;
Gruber S.B. ;
Anton-Culver H. ;
Klotz J.B. ;
Zanetti R. ;
Gallagher R.P. ;
Dwyer T. ;
Rebbeck T.R. ;
Berwick M.R. .
Cancer Causes & Control, 2004, 15 (9) :957-965
[9]   OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MAZUMDAR, M .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1088-1101
[10]   MALIGNANT-MELANOMA - ETIOLOGIC IMPORTANCE OF INDIVIDUAL PIGMENTATION AND SUN EXPOSURE [J].
BEITNER, H ;
NORELL, SE ;
RINGBORG, U ;
WENNERSTEN, G ;
MATTSON, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1990, 122 (01) :43-51