Changes in microbial properties associated with long-term arsenic and DDT contaminated soils at disused cattle dip sites

被引:50
作者
Edvantoro, BB
Naidu, R
Megharaj, M
Singleton, I
机构
[1] CSIRO Land & Water, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Dept Soil & Water, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia
关键词
long-term pollution; contaminant mixtures; arsenic; DDT; bioavailability; microbial biomass; soil respiration;
D O I
10.1016/S0147-6513(02)00092-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This work examined the effect of long-term arsenic (As) and DDT contamination on soil microbial properties at 11 cattle dip sites in northern New South Wales, Australia. Total As in the surface (0-10 cm) soils from these sites ranged from 34 to 2941 mg As kg(-1) soil and hexane-ex tractable DDT concentrations ranged between 2.9 and 7673 mg DDT kg(-1) soil. The concentrations of water and oxalate-extractable As were positively correlated with total As. Oxalate-extractable As was more strongly correlated (r(2) = 0.87) with total As than water-extractable As (r(2) = 0.34). A weak positive relationship was observed between the level of nutrient (organic carbon and nitrogen) and microbial biomass C (r(2) = 0.61 and 0.45, respectively). There was a highly significant difference between the microbial properties of polluted and unpolluted sites (P<0.001). In comparison to unpolluted soils, fungal counts, microbial biomass C, and respiration were dramatically reduced (P<0.05) in polluted soils. However, the bacterial population between polluted and unpolluted soils were not different (P<0.05). The results of this study suggested that (a) long-term contamination of soils adjacent to former cattle dipping sites by As and DDT adversely affected soil microbial properties with the fungal populations being the most sensitive and (b) there was little regeneration of microbiota despite 25 years of field ageing of the soils. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 351
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Allison L.E., 1965, METHODS SOIL ANAL 2, P1367, DOI DOI 10.2134/AGRONMONOGR9.2.C39
[3]  
BAKER KH, 1994, BIOREMEDIATION, P1
[4]   IMPACT OF PASTURE CONTAMINATION BY COPPER, CHROMIUM, AND ARSENIC TIMBER PRESERVATIVE ON SOIL MICROBIAL PROPERTIES AND NEMATODES [J].
BARDGETT, RD ;
SPEIR, TW ;
ROSS, DJ ;
YEATES, GW ;
KETTLES, HA .
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 1994, 18 (01) :71-79
[5]  
BISESSAR S, 1982, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V17, P305
[6]   THE USE OF MICROBIAL PARAMETERS IN MONITORING SOIL POLLUTION BY HEAVY-METALS [J].
BROOKES, PC .
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 1995, 19 (04) :269-279
[7]   MICROBIAL BIOMASS DYNAMICS DURING THE DECOMPOSITION OF GLUCOSE AND MAIZE IN METAL-CONTAMINATED AND NON-CONTAMINATED SOILS [J].
CHANDER, K ;
BROOKES, PC .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1991, 23 (10) :917-925
[8]   METALS IN AGRICULTURAL SOILS OF ONTARIO [J].
FRANK, R ;
ISHIDA, K ;
SUDA, P .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1976, 56 (03) :181-196
[9]  
Gardner W. H., 1986, Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods, P493
[10]   EFFECT OF ARSENIC POLLUTION ON SOIL MICROBIAL-POPULATION [J].
HIROKI, M .
SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 1993, 39 (02) :227-235