Standard-Essential Patents

被引:99
作者
Lerner, Josh [1 ]
Tirole, Jean [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Toulouse Sch Econ, Toulouse, France
[3] Inst Adv Study, Toulouse, France
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
SETTING ORGANIZATIONS; RULES; POOLS; POWER; FIRM;
D O I
10.1086/680995
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A major policy issue in standard setting is that patents that are ex ante not that important, by being included into a standard, may become standard-essential patents. In an attempt to curb the monopoly power that they create, most standard-setting organizations require the owners of patents covered by the standard to make a loose commitment to grant licenses on reasonable terms. Such commitments unsurprisingly are conducive to litigation. This paper builds a framework for the analysis of these patents, identifies several types of inefficiencies attached to the lack of price commitments, and shows how structured price commitments restore competition and why such commitments may not arise spontaneously in the marketplace.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 586
页数:40
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 903214 HARV U NEG OR
[2]   COALITION-FORMATION IN STANDARD-SETTING ALLIANCES [J].
AXELROD, R ;
MITCHELL, W ;
THOMAS, RE ;
BENNETT, DS ;
BRUDERER, E .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1995, 41 (09) :1493-1508
[3]  
Boutin Aleksandra, 2014, SCREENING GOOD UNPUB
[4]   Optimal formation rules for patent pools [J].
Brenner, Steffen .
ECONOMIC THEORY, 2009, 40 (03) :373-388
[5]   The rules of standard-setting organizations: an empirical analysis [J].
Chiao, Benjamin ;
Lerner, Josh ;
Tirole, Jean .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2007, 38 (04) :905-930
[6]  
Gilbert RJ, 2011, ANTITRUST LAW J, V77, P855
[7]  
GUESNERIE R, 1984, J PUBLIC ECON, V25, P329, DOI 10.1016/0047-2727(84)90060-4
[8]  
Kovbasyuk Sergei, 2013, OPTIMAL CERTIF UNPUB
[9]  
Kuhn Kai-Uwe, 2013, CPI ANTITRUST CH MAR
[10]   Moving beyond simple examples: Assessing the incremental value rule within standards [J].
Layne-Farrar, Anne ;
Llobet, Gerard .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2014, 36 :57-69