Revisiting the problem of correcting retention parameters for pressure and temperature in gas chromatography

被引:16
作者
Davankov, VA [1 ]
机构
[1] Russian Acad Sci, AN Nesmeyanov Organoelement Cpds Inst, Moscow 117813, Russia
关键词
gas chromatography; retention parameter correction;
D O I
10.1007/BF02467519
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
It has been shown [1, 2] that the compressibility correction factor equals the ratio of gas pressure at the column outlet to the average pressure in the column, j = p(o)/p(c), and, therefore, by multiplying by this factor, all experimentally measured retention volumes and flow rates are converted from ambient pressure to the average pressure in the column. This makes retention volumes corrected in this way independent of pressure. In contrast, correcting retention times for gas compressibility has no physical meaning and terms such as "corrected retention time" and "net retention time" should not be used. Similarly, recalculating corrected retention volumes to a standard temperature of 273 K appears to provide a thermodynamically sound basis for comparison of data obtained at different temperatures. In reality, it distorts actual relationships and should not be used.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 73
页数:3
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   DEPENDENCE OF RETENTION OF ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS ON CARRIER GAS-PRESSURE IN CAPILLARY ADSORPTION CHROMATOGRAPHY [J].
BEREZKIN, VG ;
MALYUKOVA, IV ;
ALISHOEV, VR .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 1995, 699 (1-2) :155-159
[2]   The true physical meaning of the corrected retention volumes in GC [J].
Davankov, VA .
CHROMATOGRAPHIA, 1997, 44 (5-6) :279-282
[3]   ''Rediscovering'' the physical meaning of corrected retention volumes in GC [J].
Davankov, VA .
CHROMATOGRAPHIA, 1996, 42 (1-2) :111-111
[4]   NOMENCLATURE FOR CHROMATOGRAPHY [J].
ETTRE, LS .
PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 1993, 65 (04) :819-872
[5]   GAS-LIQUID PARTITION CHROMATOGRAPHY - THE SEPARATION AND MICRO-ESTIMATON OF VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS FROM FORMIC ACID TO DODECANOIC ACID [J].
JAMES, AT ;
MARTIN, AJP .
BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 1952, 50 (05) :679-690