Parameter estimability of biphasic response models

被引:10
作者
Dutta, S
Ebling, WF
机构
[1] SUNY BUFFALO,DEPT PHARMACEUT,AMHERST,NY 14260
[2] DUPONT MERCK PHARMACEUT CO,STINE HASKELL RES CTR,DRUG METAB & PHARMACOKINET SECT,NEWARK,DE 19714
关键词
D O I
10.1021/js960248f
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Pharmacodynamics of general anesthetic agents generally exhibit biphasic concentration-effect relationships (i,e., an activation phase at low concentrations and inhibition at higher concentrations), These relationships are usually characterized with biphasic models constructed from various combinations and modifications oi the nonlinear sigmoid E(MAX) model, We tested and quantified the parameter estimability of the simplest additive biphasic pharmacodynamic models by a Monte Carlo method. The estimated model parameters were used to calculate descriptors of the concentration-effect data. Parameters and descriptors were compared with their true values. When the IC50/EC(50) ratio was low (<10), E(MAX), EC(50), and IC50 were poorly estimated (high coefficient of variation and pronounced bias). However, the fit to the data was excellent, and the data descriptors calculated from the estimated model parameters demonstrated high precision and accuracy. Baseline effect (Eo) was estimated with good precision and accuracy. As the IC50/EC(50) ratio was increased, the estimability of model parameters and data descriptors improved, with the data descriptors continuing to be more estimable than model parameters. Thus, model parameters become estimable when there is sufficient separation between EC(50) and IC50 to produce a plateauing of peak effect [activation], which can be observed directly from the data signature, Data descriptors are not subject to this limitation and thus may serve as better metrics for summarizing concentration-effect relationships.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 51
页数:8
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
BUHRER M, 1992, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V77, P226
[2]   PROGRAM PACKAGE FOR SIMULATION AND PARAMETER-ESTIMATION IN PHARMACOKINETIC SYSTEMS [J].
DARGENIO, DZ ;
SCHUMITZKY, A .
COMPUTER PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 1979, 9 (02) :115-134
[3]   Is it possible to estimate the parameters of the sigmoid E(max) model with truncated data typical of clinical studies? [J].
Dutta, S ;
Matsumoto, Y ;
Ebling, WF .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1996, 85 (02) :232-239
[4]   Concentration-EEG effect relationship of propofol in rats [J].
Dutta, S ;
Matsumoto, Y ;
Gothgen, NU ;
Ebling, WF .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1997, 86 (01) :37-43
[5]   PHARMACODYNAMIC CHARACTERIZATION OF THE ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC EFFECTS OF THIOPENTAL IN RATS [J].
EBLING, WF ;
DANHOF, M ;
STANSKI, DR .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1991, 19 (02) :123-143
[6]   PHARMACOKINETIC PHARMACODYNAMIC MODELING OF THE CENTRAL-NERVOUS-SYSTEM EFFECTS OF HEPTABARBITAL USING APERIODIC EEG ANALYSIS [J].
MANDEMA, JW ;
DANHOF, M .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1990, 18 (05) :459-481
[7]   ESTIMATION OF AMOBARBITAL PLASMA-EFFECT SITE EQUILIBRATION KINETICS - RELEVANCE OF POLYEXPONENTIAL CONDUCTANCE FUNCTIONS [J].
MANDEMA, JW ;
VENGPEDERSEN, P ;
DANHOF, M .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1991, 19 (06) :617-634
[8]   MULTIPLE RECEPTOR RESPONSES - NEW CONCEPT TO DESCRIBE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PHARMACOLOGICAL EFFECTS AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF A DRUG - STUDIES ON CLONIDINE IN THE RAT AND CAT [J].
PAALZOW, LK ;
EDLUND, PO .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1979, 7 (05) :495-510
[9]  
PRESS WH, 1996, BIOSTAT ANAL, P231
[10]  
Press WH, 1992, NUMERICAL RECIPES FO, P390