Dedicated minimally invasive surgery suites increase operating room efficiency

被引:32
作者
Kenyon, TAG [1 ]
Urbach, DR [1 ]
Speer, JB [1 ]
Waterman-Hukari, B [1 ]
Foraker, GF [1 ]
Hansen, PD [1 ]
Swanström, LL [1 ]
机构
[1] Emanuel Hosp & Hlth Ctr, Legacy Hlth Syst, Dept Minimally Invas Surg, Portland, OR 97227 USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2001年 / 15卷 / 10期
关键词
laparoscopy; operating room; minimally invasive surgery; minimally invasive surgery suite; endosuite; efficiency; costs;
D O I
10.1007/s004640080092
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The rapid adoption of laparoscopic surgery since the late 1980s added tremendous complexity into the operating room (OR) environment. For each case, a plethora of additional equipment-including monitors, video equipment, wiring, tubing, and cords-had to be set up, prolonging OR turnover time and decreasing OR efficiency. In 1993, the concept of designated minimally invasive surgery (MIS) suites was introduced. MIS suites integrated monitors and video equipment into the OR on ceiling-mounted columns and moved the controls to a centralized nursing station. The overall effect of this innovation on OR efficiency has not been measured. Methods: Five RNs with varying degrees of MIS experience were instructed on video setup and put-away criteria and then timed while performing, a set of standardized tasks. Each set of tasks was performed twice using a standardized surgery model. Differences in setup and put-away times between MIS suites and standard ORs were tested using the t-test for paired comparisons. Results: The mean standard deviation (SD) video setup times were 27.9 +/- 5.3 see (MIS) and 254.3 +/- 54.0 see (standard); the put-away times were 19.8 +/- 2.7 see (MIS) and 222.3 +/- 26.0 see (standard). The mean difference standard error (SE) in both the setup (226.4 +/- 16.9 see, p = 0.0001) and put-away times (202.5 +/- 8.6, p = 0.0001) were large and statistically significant. Conclusion: Using a simulation model, we have demonstrated that the use of a MIS suite reduces video setup and put-away time significantly, with the potential for significant associated cost savings. This provides just one justification for the high cost of building such "ORs of the future."
引用
收藏
页码:1140 / 1143
页数:4
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
Alarcon A, 1996, SURG ENDOSC, V10, P916
[2]   A comparison of surgeons' posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures [J].
Berguer, R ;
Rab, GT ;
AbuGhaida, H ;
Alarcon, A ;
Chung, J .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1997, 11 (02) :139-142
[3]   Surgical technology and the ergonomics of laparoscopic instruments [J].
Berguer, R .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1998, 12 (05) :458-462
[4]   The Interventional Centre -: 31 months experience with a department merging surgical and image-guided intervention [J].
Fosse, E ;
Lærum, F ;
Rotnes, JS .
MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 1999, 8 (05) :361-369
[5]  
HERRON DM, 2001, IN PRESS MINIMALLY I
[6]   Cost and benefit of the trained laparoscopic team - A comparative study of a designated nursing team vs a nontrained team [J].
Kenyon, TAG ;
Lenker, MP ;
Bax, TW ;
Swanstrom, LL .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1997, 11 (08) :812-814
[7]  
Reichert T, 1998, Surg Technol Int, V7, P25