An investigation of entrance surface dose calculations for diagnostic radiology using Monte Carlo simulations and radiotherapy dosimetry formalisms

被引:23
作者
Ben Omrane, L
Verhaegen, F
Chahed, N
Mtimet, S
机构
[1] Hop Enfants, Ctr Natl Radio Protect, Tunis, Tunisia
[2] McGill Univ, Montreal Gen Hosp, Med Phys Unit, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/48/12/310
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Our aim in this work was to investigate the methodology used in the determination of the entrance surface dose (ESD) in diagnostic radiology. In kV x-rays for low-energy photons (tube potential up to 160 kV, HVL 1-8 mm Al), the ESD is based on the use of the ratio of mass-energy absorption coefficients and backscatter factors. A full simulation of the photon and electron transport in a kilovoltage x-ray unit, using the Monte Carlo code BEAM/EGS4, was performed to obtain an accurate beam phase space for use in dose calculation. The modelled phase space was experimentally validated for the beam qualities (measured HVL: 3.3 mm Al-2.2 mm Cu) and showed good agreement between calculated and measured HVLs, air kerma and relative dose distributions. We have computed the conversion factors from air kerma to water or soft tissue absorbed dose at the surface of a phantom for beam qualities (HVL: 3.3-8.35 mm Al). The same model was also used to calculate the ESD in water and in soft tissue for the low-energy photon range considered. The results show that the numerical differences between the air kerma and the water kerma based backscatter factors are insignificant. The same conclusion was reached for the (mu(en)/rho) ratios, for soft tissue to air, evaluated using either the primary photon spectra or the spectra at the surface of a phantom. Furthermore, the good agreement obtained for the computation of the conversion factors with a full BEAM/EGS4 model confirms the previous studies which are based on different sources for the spectral distribution and different beam geometries (pencil beam or point source assumptions). On the other hand, the ESD in water or soft tissue is well described either with the B-air or the B-omega formalism. Conversion factors from air kerma to ESD in these media are proposed in this work for several beam qualities in diagnostic radiology.
引用
收藏
页码:1809 / 1824
页数:16
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Phys Med Biol, V41, P2605
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, TISS SUBST RAD DOS M
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, 33 ICRU
[4]   COMPUTATION OF BREMSSTRAHLUNG X-RAY-SPECTRA AND COMPARISON WITH SPECTRA MEASURED WITH A GE(LI) DETECTOR [J].
BIRCH, R ;
MARSHALL, M .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1979, 24 (03) :505-517
[5]   The effect of beam tube potential variation on gonad dose to patients during chest radiography investigated using high sensitivity LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescent dosemeters [J].
Fung, KKL ;
Gilboy, WB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2001, 74 (880) :358-367
[6]   BACKSCATTER FACTORS FOR X-RAYS GENERATED AT VOLTAGES BETWEEN 10 AND 100 KV [J].
GROSSWENDT, B .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1984, 29 (05) :579-591
[7]   DEPENDENCE OF THE PHOTON BACKSCATTER FACTOR FOR WATER ON SOURCE-TO-PHANTOM DISTANCE AND IRRADIATION FIELD SIZE [J].
GROSSWENDT, B .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1990, 35 (09) :1233-1245
[8]   DEPENDENCE OF THE PHOTON BACKSCATTER FACTOR FOR WATER ON IRRADIATION FIELD SIZE AND SOURCE-TO-PHANTOM DISTANCES BETWEEN 1.5 AND 10 CM [J].
GROSSWENDT, B .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1993, 38 (02) :305-310
[9]   BACKSCATTER FACTORS FOR DIAGNOSTIC-RADIOLOGY (1-4 MM AL HVL) [J].
HARRISON, RM .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1982, 27 (12) :1465-1474
[10]  
HART D, 1993, R262 NAT RAD PROT BO