Complementary relationship with a convective boundary layer model to estimate regional evaporation

被引:34
作者
Sugita, M [1 ]
Usui, J
Tamagawa, I
Kaihotsu, I
机构
[1] Univ Tsukuba, Inst Geosci, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058571, Japan
[2] Univ Tsukuba, Coll Nat Sci, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
[3] Gifu Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Gifu 5011193, Japan
[4] Hiroshima Univ, Fac Integrated Arts & Sci, Hiroshima 7398521, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2000WR900299
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An idea to use a simple convective boundary layer (CBL) model in the complementary relationship to estimate regional evaporation was explored. The CBL model simulated the potential specific humidity deficit D in CBL when the bulk stomatal resistance r(st) = 0. This value of D was then used in the Penman-type equation to derive evaporation E-po that would occur with ample soil moisture under the prevailing weather condition. The same equation was also used to produce the potential evaporation E with the actual humidity deficit, and these E-p and E-po values allowed the evaluation of the actual evaporation E by applying the complementary relationship E = etaE(po) - E-p,, where eta is assumed as 2.0. This was tested with the data set obtained in Hexi Corn desert area in northwestern China with a modified version of a simple CBL model developed by Lhomme [1997]. It was found that the method produced better estimates of the daytime mean E values with smaller bias than those obtained from a conventional application of the complementary relationship without the CBL model. Also, it was shown that the assumption of eta = 2.0 in the complementary relationship was only approximate in most cases. To take this into account, an additional procedure was explored in which eta was treated as a variable, and an iteration process with the CBL model determined the final 77 and E values. It was found that this process produced E values that have smaller systematic error and agree better with the measurements on average, but the unsystematic error got worse than that found with 77 = 2.0, probably because of use of the CBL model with r(st) not equal 0 in the iteration process.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 365
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
BOUCHET R. J., 1963, Publ. Int. Ass. sci. Hydrol. 62 gen. Assembly Berkeley, P134
[2]  
Brutsaert W, 1996, J ATMOS SCI, V53, P209, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<0209:SHTPFS>2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]   ADVECTION-ARIDITY APPROACH TO ESTIMATE ACTUAL REGIONAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION [J].
BRUTSAERT, W ;
STRICKER, H .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1979, 15 (02) :443-450
[5]   THEORY FOR LOCAL EVAPORATION (OR HEAT-TRANSFER) FROM ROUGH AND SMOOTH SURFACES AT GROUND LEVEL [J].
BRUTSAERT, W .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1975, 11 (04) :543-550
[6]   STABILITY CORRECTION FUNCTIONS FOR THE MEAN WIND-SPEED AND TEMPERATURE IN THE UNSTABLE SURFACE-LAYER [J].
BRUTSAERT, W .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1992, 19 (05) :469-472
[8]  
Brutsaert W., 2013, Evaporation into the Atmosphere: Theory, History and Applications
[9]  
DEBRUIN HAR, 1979, J APPL METEOROL, V18, P898, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1979)018<0898:TPTEMA>2.0.CO
[10]  
2