Number of air exchanges, sucrose concentration, photosynthetic photon flux, and differences in photoperiod and dark period temperatures affect growth of Rehmannia glutinosa plantlets in vitro

被引:42
作者
Cui, YY
Hahn, EJ
Kozai, T
Paek, KY [1 ]
机构
[1] Chungbuk Natl Univ, Res Ctr Dev Adv Hort Technol, Cheonju 361763, South Korea
[2] Chiba Univ, Fac Hort, Matsudo, Chiba 2718510, Japan
关键词
acclimatization; CO2; concentration; photosynthesis; reducing sugar; total sugar;
D O I
10.1023/A:1006412321864
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Rehmannia glutinosa plantlets were cultured for 4 weeks under different culture conditions to determine the optimum environment for in vitro growth and ex vitro survival. Plantlet growth increased with an increasing number of air exchanges of the culture vessel, exhibiting greatest shoot weight, total fresh weight, leaf area, and chlorophyll content at 4.4 h(-1) of air exchanges. High sucrose concentration (30 g l(-1)) increased root weight but reduced shoot growth. Net photosynthetic rates of the plantlets were greatest when sucrose was not added to the medium. On the other hand, ex vitro survival of the plantlets was not influenced by sucrose concentration. In the experiment on difference in photoperiod and dark period temperatures (DIF) and photosynthetic photon flux (PPF), plantlet growth increased as DIF and PPF levels increased. Particularly, increasing PPF level had a more distinctive effect on plantlet growth than increasing DIF level. The interaction of DIF x PPF was also significant, showing the greatest plantlet growth in positive DIF (+8 DIF) and a high PPF (210 mu mol m(-2) s(-1)). In conclusion, the results of this experiment suggest that increased number of air exchanges of the culture vessel, decreased sucrose concentration, and positive DIF in combination with high PPF level enhanced growth and acclimatization of Rehmannia glutinosa plantlets.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 226
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Chae YA, 1993, KOR J MED CROP SCI, V1, P184
[2]  
DEPROFT MP, 1985, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V65, P375, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1985.tb08660.x
[3]  
Desjardins Y, 1995, ACTA HORTIC, P45, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.1995.393.5
[4]  
DUBIOS M, 1956, ANAL CHEM, V28, P356
[5]   TEMPERATURE AND PHOTOPERIOD EFFECTS ON FUCHSIA XHYBRIDA MORPHOLOGY [J].
ERWIN, JE ;
HEINS, RD ;
MOE, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1991, 116 (06) :955-960
[6]  
Fujiwara K., 1995, AUTOMATION ENV CONTR, P319, DOI [10.1007/978-94-015-8461-6_15, DOI 10.1007/978-94-015-8461-6_15]
[7]  
Fujiwara Kazuhiro, 1987, Journal of Agricultural Meteorology, V43, P21
[8]  
JIANG LC, 1979, MED HERB LETT, V2, P41
[9]   GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF PETUNIA XHYBRIDA AS A FUNCTION OF TEMPERATURE AND IRRADIANCE [J].
KACZPERSKI, MP ;
CARLSON, WH ;
KARLSSON, MG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1991, 116 (02) :232-237
[10]  
Kitaya Y, 1998, Life Support Biosph Sci, V5, P199