Predicting a patient's choice of dialysis modality: Experience in a United Kingdom renal department

被引:137
作者
Little, J
Irwin, A
Marshall, T
Rayner, H
Smith, S
机构
[1] Birmingham Heartlands Hosp, Dept Renal Med, Birmingham B9 5SS, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Dept Publ Hlth, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD); hemodialysis (HD); choice behavior; patient education; counseling; health planning;
D O I
10.1016/S0272-6386(05)80014-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Education and counseling are important aspects of the management of patients starting dialysis. Free choice of modality may enhance patient well-being and, in the absence of clear survival benefits for either hemodialysis (HD) or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), should have the major role in modality selection. This prospective study examines factors influencing this choice. Three hundred thirty-three new patients started renal replacement therapy at Birmingham Heartlands Hospital (Birmingham, UK) between August 1, 1992, and July 31, 1998. Data were incomplete for 14 patients, 11 patients were not counseled, and 54 patients had contraindications to a particular modality. The remaining 254 patients were offered a free choice. One hundred thirty-nine patients (55%) chose HD and 115 patients (45%) chose CARD. Independent predictors for choosing CARD rather than HD were being married (P = 0.004), being counseled before the start of dialysis (P = 0.019), and increased distance from the base unit (P < 0.001). Independent predictors for choosing HD were increasing age (P = 0.030) and male sex (P = 0.041). Use of these data should enhance planning of dialysis services and bring nearer the goal that all new patients with ESRD are able to have the dialysis modality of their choice. (C) 2001 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:981 / 986
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Am J Kidney Dis, V30, pS67
[2]  
ANSELL D, 1999, 2 REN ASS
[3]   Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: A comparison of adjusted mortality rates [J].
Fenton, SSA ;
Schaubel, DE ;
Desmeules, M ;
Morrison, HI ;
Mao, Y ;
Copleston, P ;
Jeffery, JR ;
Kjellstrand, CM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1997, 30 (03) :334-342
[4]  
GOKAL R, 1987, LANCET, V2, P1105
[5]   Excess morbidity in patients starting uremia therapy without prior care by a nephrologist [J].
Ifudu, O ;
Dawood, M ;
Homel, P ;
Friedman, EA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1996, 28 (06) :841-845
[6]  
INNES A, 1992, NEPHROL DIAL TRANSPL, V7, P467
[7]  
Jung B, 1999, PERITON DIALYSIS INT, V19, P263
[8]   The pattern of referral of patients with end-stage renal disease to the nephrologist - a European survey [J].
Lameire, N ;
Van Biesen, W .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 14 :16-23
[9]   Multidisciplinary predialysis programs: Quantification and limitations of their impact on patient outcomes in two Canadian settings [J].
Levin, A ;
Lewis, M ;
Mortiboy, P ;
Faber, S ;
Hare, I ;
Porter, EC ;
Mendelssohn, DC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1997, 29 (04) :533-540
[10]  
Maiorca R, 1996, ADV PERIT D, V12, P79