Current appraisal of external quality assurance procedures in geriatric rehabilitation

被引:4
作者
Luebke, N. [1 ]
Meinck, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kompetenz Ctr Geriatrie MDK Nord, MDS, Gemeinschaft Spitzenverbande Gesetzlichen Kranken, D-20097 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
geriatric rehabilitation; quality assurance; geriatrics; quality assurance procedures;
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-991139
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Seven standardized external quality assurance (QA) Procedures are currently being applied in geriatric rehabilitation in Germany. Five of these procedures are case-based (Gernidas (R), GiB-DAT, KODAS, EVA-Reha (R), Evaluation Procedures of the Medical Review, Board of Saxony), and two are institution-based (Quality Seal for Geriatric Rehabilitation in Rhineland-Palatinate, Quality Seal for Geriatrics BAG KGE). The institution-based procedures focus on the quality dimensions "structure" and "process", whereas the case-based procedures mainly focus on the collection of administrative data, and to a limited extent on the quality dimensions "outcomes" and "patient satisfaction". The outcome quality parameters used in the case-based QA procedures are usually the "place of discharge" versus the "place of residence", the "improvement in coping with daily activities" (mostly based on the Barthel Index), and the "improvement in mobility and gait" (based on the Timed Up & Go). So far, outcomes to be specified at the beginning of rehabilitation measures have only been defined in few procedures, and only to a basic degree or on a trial basis. In the institution-based procedures, the data are mainly collected by external data collectors, whereas in the case-based procedures, they are collected by the service providers themselves. In most procedures, data processing and analysis are performed independently of the participating service providers but only partly independently of the agency responsible for the procedure and the whole group of service providers. In the case-based procedures, risk adjustment techniques are not routinely applied in comparisons between institutions. Attempts to implement standardised QA procedures in geriatric rehabilitation may,be based on existing procedures and should use this appraisal for developing them further, however taking more into account QA aspects specific to geriatrics.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 48
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
BLINKERT B, 2004, SOZIALER FORTSCHRITT, V53, P319
[2]  
*CTR MED MED SERV, 2004, INP REH FAC PAT ASS
[3]  
*DIMDI, 2007, INT KLASS KRANKH ICD
[4]  
DIMDI. Deutsches Institut fur Medizinische Dokumentation und Information, 2005, ICF INT KLASS FUNKT
[5]  
FARIN E, 2005, PRAVENTION REHABILIT, V17, P125
[6]  
Farin Erik, 2004, Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich, V98, P655
[7]   MINI-MENTAL STATE - PRACTICAL METHOD FOR GRADING COGNITIVE STATE OF PATIENTS FOR CLINICIAN [J].
FOLSTEIN, MF ;
FOLSTEIN, SE ;
MCHUGH, PR .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (03) :189-198
[8]  
GERDELMANN W, 2004, ERSATZKASSE, P262
[9]   OUTCOME MEASUREMENT IN MEDICAL REHABILITATION [J].
GRANGER, CV ;
BROWNSCHEIDLE, CM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 1995, 11 (02) :262-268
[10]   A SHORT PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE BATTERY ASSESSING LOWER-EXTREMITY FUNCTION - ASSOCIATION WITH SELF-REPORTED DISABILITY AND PREDICTION OF MORTALITY AND NURSING-HOME ADMISSION [J].
GURALNIK, JM ;
SIMONSICK, EM ;
FERRUCCI, L ;
GLYNN, RJ ;
BERKMAN, LF ;
BLAZER, DG ;
SCHERR, PA ;
WALLACE, RB .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY, 1994, 49 (02) :M85-M94