Health-related quality-of-life and quality-days incrementally gained in symptomatic nonerosive GERD patients treated with lansoprazole or ranitidine

被引:31
作者
Mathias, SD
Colwell, HH
Miller, DP
Pasta, DJ
Henning, JM
Ofman, JJ
机构
[1] Lewin Grp, Hlth Outcomes, San Francisco, CA 94107 USA
[2] TAP Holdings Inc, Deerfield, IL USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Zynx Hlth Inc, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
GERD; health-related quality of life; questionnaire; lansoprazole;
D O I
10.1023/A:1012363501101
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Eight-hundred forty-nine patients with symptomatic nonerosive GERD from two clinical trials of lansoprazole 15 mg daily (LAN 15) and lansoprazole 30 mg daily (LAN 30) vs ranitidine 150 mg twice a day (RAN 150) completed a health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) questionnaire at baseline and four and eight weeks after treatment. The questionnaire included the Short-Form 12, GERD symptoms, eating symptoms, social restrictions, problems with sleep, work disability, treatment satisfaction, and associated importance weights items. Both LAN groups reported greater, although not significant, improvement from baseline to week 8 versus RAN 150 in the majority of HRQoL scales. Treatment satisfaction was significantly higher at week 8 in both LAN groups. Quality-days incrementally gained analysis showed that both LAN groups gained significantly more quality days than RAN 150. Patients taking lansoprazole 15 or 30 mg daily reported better outcomes than those receiving ranitidine 150 twice a day over the eight-week study.
引用
收藏
页码:2416 / 2423
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Development of a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire for individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease - A validation study [J].
Colwell, HH ;
Mathias, SD ;
Pasta, DJ ;
Henning, JM ;
Hunt, RH .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1999, 44 (07) :1376-1383
[2]  
Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
[3]  
DeVault K R, 1995, Arch Intern Med, V155, P2165
[5]  
Dobrilla G, 1993, Clin Ther, V15 Suppl B, P2
[6]   The diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in a managed care environment - Suggested disease management guidelines [J].
Fennerty, MB ;
Castell, D ;
Fendrick, AM ;
Halpern, M ;
Johnson, D ;
Kahrilas, PJ ;
Lieberman, D ;
Richter, JE ;
Sampliner, RE .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 156 (05) :477-484
[7]   Treating the symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: A double-blind comparison of omeprazole and cisapride [J].
Galmiche, JP ;
Barthelemy, P ;
Hamelin, B .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1997, 11 (04) :765-773
[8]   OLDER PATIENTS HEALTH-STATUS AND SATISFACTION WITH MEDICAL-CARE IN AN HMO POPULATION [J].
HALL, JA ;
FELDSTEIN, M ;
FRETWELL, MD ;
ROWE, JW ;
EPSTEIN, AM .
MEDICAL CARE, 1990, 28 (03) :261-270
[9]   Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: A population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota [J].
Locke, GR ;
Talley, NJ ;
Fett, SL ;
Zinsmeister, AR ;
Melton, LJ .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 112 (05) :1448-1456
[10]   Use of the Short Form-36 to detect the influence of upper gastrointestinal disease on self-reported health status [J].
Mant, JWF ;
Jenkinson, C ;
Murphy, MFG ;
Clipsham, K ;
Marshall, P ;
Vessey, MP .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1998, 7 (03) :221-226