Is carcino-embryonic antigen useful in the follow-up management of patients with colorectal liver metastases?

被引:58
作者
Bakalakos, EA
Burak, WE
Young, DC
Martin, EW
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Surg, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Div Surg Oncol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Arthur G James Canc Hosp & Res Inst, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00303-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The role of carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) in monitoring early detection of recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer, and its impact on resectability rate and patient survival remains controversial. Our objective was to determine any association between the preoperative level of CEA and prognosis, and the resectability and survival by method of diagnosis of colorectal hepatic metastases, METHODS: We analyzed patients who underwent exploration for hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer over a 15-year period. The patient population consisted of those patients who had undergone primary colon or rectal resection and were followed up with serial CEA levels and of patients who were followed up with physical examination, liver function tests (LFTs) or computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis that led to the diagnosis of liver metastases. Also included in the study were patients who were diagnosed with liver metastases at the time of the primary colon or rectal resection and underwent planned hepatic resection at a later time. RESULTS: Three hundred and one (301) patients who underwent a total of 345 planned hepatic resections for metastatic colorectal cancer between January 1978 and December 1993 were included in this analysis. The median preoperative CEA level was 24.8 ng/mL in the resected group, 53.0 ng/mL in the incomplete resection group, and 49.1 ng/mL in the nonresected group (P = 0.02), More of the patients who had a preoperative CEA less than or equal to 30 ng/mL were in the resected group, while those who had a preoperative CEA >30 ng/mL were likely to be in the nonresected group (P = 0.002), The median survival was 25 months for patients with a preoperative CEA level less than or equal to 30 ng/mL and 17 months for patients with a preoperative CEA >30 ng/mL (P = 0.0005). The resectability rate and the survival of patients by method of diagnosing liver metastases-rising CEA versus history and physical, elevated LFTs, CT scan versus diagnosis at the time of primary resection-was not significant (P = 0.06 and P = 0.19, respectively). Given the nonstandardized retrospective nature of the study cohort and relative small groups of patients, the power to detect small differences in survival by method of diagnosis is limited. In the complete resection group of patients with unilobar liver disease (5-year survival of 28.8%) there was no difference in survival between those patients who had normal preoperative CEA and those who had elevated preoperative CEA, and approximately 90% of them had an abnormal preoperative serum CEA level. CONCLUSIONS: CEA is useful in the preoperative evaluation of patients with hepatic colorectal metastases for assessing prognosis and is complimentary to history and physical examination in the diagnosis of liver metastases. Patients with colorectal liver metastases and preoperative CEA less than or equal to 30 ng/mL are more likely to be resectable, and they have the longest survival. Am J Surg. 1999;177:2-6. (C) 1999 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 6
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Repeat hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases
    Adam, R
    Bismuth, H
    Castaing, D
    Waechter, F
    Navarro, F
    Abascal, A
    Majno, P
    Engerran, L
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1997, 225 (01) : 51 - 60
  • [2] Determinants of survival following hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer
    Bakalakos, EA
    Kim, JA
    Young, DC
    Martin, EW
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 22 (04) : 399 - 405
  • [3] Surgical margin in hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis - A critical and improvable determinant of outcome
    Cady, B
    Jenkins, RL
    Steele, GD
    Lewis, WD
    Stone, MD
    McDermott, WV
    Jessup, JM
    Bothe, A
    Lalor, P
    Lovett, EJ
    Lavin, P
    Linehan, DC
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 227 (04) : 566 - 571
  • [4] CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN
    FLETCHER, RH
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1986, 104 (01) : 66 - 73
  • [5] Liver resection for colorectal metastases
    Fong, YM
    Cohen, AM
    Fortner, JG
    Enker, WE
    Turnbull, AD
    Coit, DG
    Marrero, AM
    Prasad, M
    Blumgart, LH
    Brennan, MF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (03) : 938 - 946
  • [6] MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS OF A PERSONAL SERIES OF 247 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS WITH LIVER METASTASES FROM COLORECTAL-CANCER .1. TREATMENT BY HEPATIC RESECTION
    FORTNER, JG
    SILVA, JS
    GOLBEY, RB
    COX, EB
    MACLEAN, BJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1984, 199 (03) : 306 - 316
  • [7] DEMONSTRATION OF TUMOR-SPECIFIC ANTIGENS IN HUMAN COLONIC CARCINOMATA BY IMMUNOLOGICAL TOLERANCE AND ABSORPTION TECHNIQUES
    GOLD, P
    FREEDMAN, SO
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 1965, 121 (03) : 439 - +
  • [8] GWIN JL, 1993, SEMIN ONCOL, V20, P520
  • [9] CEA MONITORING OF PALLIATIVE TREATMENT FOR COLORECTAL CARCINOMA
    HERRERA, MA
    CHU, TM
    HOLYOKE, ED
    MITTELMAN, A
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1977, 185 (01) : 23 - 30
  • [10] HUGHES KS, 1988, SURGERY, V103, P278